You may not realise it, but the choices you make when investing assets in your 401(k) plan may be influenced by the selections your co-workers are making.
A new study by the Pension Research Council at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School found that 401(k) participants are influenced by their co-workers when they make equity investments.
Individuals are likely to increase the portion of their 401(k) that’s allocated to stocks when their peers earn higher equity returns, and they often pull money out of the stock market when peers experience stock market losses.
“People may use their co-workers’ asset returns to update their own beliefs about the equity market,” says Timothy Lu, an assistant professor at Peking University HSBC Business School and author of the report.
“People generally care about not only their absolute wealth, but also their wealth relative to their peers. Hence, they may make asset allocation adjustments when their peers have earned abnormal returns on equity.”
Positive peer returns have a much higher impact on an individual’s 401(k) choices than negative returns, the study of 173,923 randomly selected Vanguard Group 401(k) participants between January 2005 to December 2009 found.
“People enjoy talking about their successful stories, but would rather remain silent when they are not doing so well,” says Lu. “Communication about 401(k) investments is likely to be biased toward positive returns.”
Individual 401(k) participants react even more strongly when their co-workers have significant positive or negative returns. A retirement saver is likely to increase his equity ratio by 1.4 percentage points when his co-worker’s equity returns exceed 4 per cent, Lu found. When peers’ investments lose more than 4 per cent, the saver decreases the equity portion of his portfolio by 0.9 percentage points.
“When your co-workers earn above-average returns on their pension investments, this has a spillover effect on your own pension investment selections,” says Olivia Mitchell, director of the Boettner centre for Pensions and Retirement Research at the University of Pennsylvania.
“When participants in 401(k) plans make pension investment decisions, they tend to be influenced by what their co-workers are doing, rather than being directed simply by the principles of risk diversification and related concepts.”
Earlier research has shown that your colleagues may also influence whether you sign up for the 401(k) plan or attend a 401(k) education seminar. One study offered a randomly selected subset of employees who were not yet enrolled in their company’sretirement account $20 to attend a benefits information fair.
Among those who were offered the financial incentive, 28 per cent attended, while only 5 per cent of employees who worked in departments in which no one was offered a monetary reward attended. Interestingly, employees who were not offered a financial incentive but who worked in the same department as someone who was offered a reward had a 15.1 per cent attendance rate for the seminar, perhaps because their peers receiving the reward influenced them to attend.
“An employee who sees colleagues receiving the inducement letter might be reminded of the fair and be led to think that this is an important event worth rewarding employees for attending and thus might decide to attend herself,” write Esther Duflo of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Emmanuel Saez of the University of California—Berkeley in the 2003 study of 6,200 university staff employees. “Individuals who receive the letter and decide to go to the fair might ask their colleagues to join them.”
A year later, the retirement-plan enrollment rates in departments in which some employees received the financial incentive were about 1.25 percentage points higher than in departments in which no reward was offered for attendance.
But the sign-up rate was not significantly higher among people who received the reward themselves than among those who worked in a department where someone else received the $20 incentive.
“Social-network effects definitely caused some people to take steps which ultimately led them to change their tax-deferred account participation decision,” the researchers found.
“Our experiment induced 50 extra employees to start contributing to the tax-deferred account.”