Photo: Flickr / colinlogan
When you think about what others will do you look at what they’ve done in the past. This is often very accurate.When predicting your own behaviour you think about what you aspire to be. Um… not quite as accurate.
Peer predictions of future behaviour and achievement are often more accurate than those furnished by the self.
Although both self- and peer predictions correlate equally with future outcomes, peers tend to avoid the degree of overoptimism so often seen in self-predictions.
In 3 studies, the authors tested whether this differential accuracy arises because people give more weight to past behaviour when predicting others, but emphasise agentic information, in particular data about their aspiration level, when predicting the self.
Studies 1 and 3 showed that the exact same participants rated past behaviour more diagnostic of future performance when predicting another person but viewed aspiration-level data as more valuable when someone else was trying to predict them.
In Studies 2 and 3 (predicting an upcoming exam score and performance in a lab task, respectively), participants gave greater weight in self-predictions to aspiration-level data than did a yoked peer, who instead gave greater weight to evidence of past achievement.
This differential weighting explained why peer predictions tended to be less optimistic and, thus, more accurate. Discussion centres on strategies for predicting future behaviour and why people may remain ignorant of their own incompetence despite feedback.
Source: “Why and When Peer Prediction Is Superior to Self-Prediction: The Weight Given to Future Aspiration Versus Past Achievement.” from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Apr 16 , 2012
Read more posts on Barking Up The Wrong Tree »
NOW WATCH: Briefing videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.