- The White House’s abandonment of the Open Skies Treaty was widely condemned by Democratic lawmakers and national security experts.
- Countries that sign the treaty can conduct short-notice observational flights over other signatories to verify the status of each other’s military forces, but the US has accused Russia of restricting its access.
- The Defence Department in a statement said “Russia has increasingly used the Treaty to support propaganda narratives in an attempt to justify Russian aggression against its neighbours.”
- Michael Hayden, a retired US Air Force general and former National Security Agency director, described it as “insane.”
- Some Republicans applauded the withdrawal and called it a “positive step to end America’s dependence on dysfunctional and broken treaties.”
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
The White House’s move to abandon the Open Skies Treaty, an agreement with European allies and Russia, was widely condemned on Thursday by Democratic lawmakers and national security experts.
The State Department announced it would submit its notice of withdrawal, which starts a six-month countdown until “the United States will no longer be a party” to the treaty with 34 countries that includes Russia, Ukraine, Canada, Netherlands, and Norway. All of these countries can conduct short-notice observational flights over other signatories to verify the status of each other’s military forces, but the US has accused Russia of restricting its access.
Democratic lawmakers from the House Armed Services Committee described the move as “a slap in the face to our allies in Europe” that would leave “our deployed forces in the region at risk”
“This decision weakens our national security interests, isolates the United States since the Treaty will continue without us, and abandons a useful tool to hold Russia accountable,” Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the committee’s chairman, and Rep. Jim Cooper of Tennessee said in a joint statement.
The lawmakers added that the decision was made without any consultation with Congress and in “blatant violation” of a federal law that requires the Trump administration to signal its intent to withdraw at a minimum of 120 days beforehand.
“This is insane. I was the director of CIA,” Michael Hayden, a retired US Air Force general and former National Security Agency director, said in a tweet.
The 1992 Open Skies Treaty was initially signed by the US, Russia, and 22 other countries in an effort to promote security transparency among nations. Countries that are part of the treaty must notify other nations 72 hours in advance of missions to conduct an observational flight for security-related assurances. The host country has one day to respond.
In 2019, a Russian Tu-154 aircraft conducted an observational mission over Great Falls, Montana, and took aerial photographs for several days. The year prior, the US also flew a plane over Ukrainian territory as part of the treaty.
There has been tension between the US and Russia over claims from both countries that the other is violating the treaty.
In 2018, Russian officials accused the US of violating the spirit of the agreement by not approving its aircraft to conduct observational missions, according to Defence News. Russian media outlets also said the US had withdrawn from the treaty, which US officials denied.
The US, in turn, has accused Russia of restricting its flight access. US officials previously accused Russia of violating the treaty by restricting flights in Kaliningrad, a heavily militarised area that is home to short-range missiles. The Defence Department in a statement added that “Russia has increasingly used the Treaty to support propaganda narratives in an attempt to justify Russian aggression against its neighbours.”
The State Department said in its statement on Thursday that it may “reconsider our withdrawal” if Russia returned to “full compliance” with the treaty.
“For years, Russia has used the Open Skies Treaty to collect intelligence on civilian infrastructure and other sensitive sites in America, posing an unacceptable risk to our national security,” William Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Centre, said in a statement.
Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, one of the outspoken supporters of the US withdrawal, described it as a “positive step to end America’s dependence on dysfunctional and broken treaties.”
“The Open Skies Treaty started life as a good-faith agreement between major powers and died an asset of Russian intelligence,” Cotton said in a statement. “For Mr. Putin, the treaty was just another scheme to snatch a military and surveillance advantage over the US and NATO.”
Proponents of the treaty have argued that the flights provide the US and its allies, who do not have the same surveillance capabilities, valuable information about Russian military activities.
“Today’s announcement is part of a troubling pattern,” Arms Control Association Director Daryl Kimball said. “The Open Skies Treaty is not the first and may not be the last nuclear- or conflict-risk reduction agreement this administration has withdrawn from without a viable strategy for replacement.”