Trump wants $US4 billion for extra missile defences in what could be the biggest bluff of all time

Thaad missile lockheedLockheed MartinA Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) interceptor.
  • President Donald Trump asked Congress for $US4 billion to fund additional missile defences against North Korea, but the record shows missile defences don’t really work.
  • Even though missile defence has a shoddy record, if the US even has a slim chance of blocking a North Korean attack, it will probably deter Kim Jong Un.
  • Trump’s funding of a failing system may just be a big bluff, but it could work.

President Donald Trump asked Congress for an additional $US4 billion in defence funding to “detect, defeat, and defend against any North Korean” missile attacks on the US or its allies — and it may be part of a tremendous series of bluffs about US military capabilities.

The Senate Armed Services Committee seemed warm to the idea, saying it would “welcome” the chance to discuss funding it, and that it “looks forward” to considering the “timely” suggestion.

Trump’s trip to Asia so far has functioned as a kind of sales pitch for US-made missile defences, with the announcement that Japan would buy additional systems from the US.

Before the trip, Trump told Fox News that the US could knock down North Korean missiles 97% of the time, though it appears he conflated favourable test results with estimates of real-world performance.

According to myriad experts contacted by Business Insider, ballistic-missile defence doesn’t really work. In 2016 the Union of Concerned Scientists published “Shielded from Oversight: The Disastrous US Approach to Strategic Missile Defence,” detailing how the $US40 billion ground-based midcourse-defence missile-interceptor system essentially was a waste of money with no tangible results.

The US’s “hit-to-kill” theory of defeating incoming missiles by slamming missile interceptors into them has been likened to “hitting a bullet with another bullet,” in that it’s nearly impossible even in test settings and almost unimaginably hard to do in the field against a determined enemy.

But a mutual nuclear exchange between nations would devastate the world like never before and has never happened in history, so many of its parameters remain theoretical.

Tong Zhao, a leading expert on North Korea at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Nuclear Policy Program in Beijing, previously explained the theories of nuclear deterrence to Business Insider, saying countries like North Korea have to look at the worst-case scenario.

Basically, if there’s even a 1% chance the US or an ally could shoot down a North Korean missile, then Pyongyang risks nuclear annihilation without gaining anything in return.

According to Zhao, “the US will never allow [the North Koreans] to feel their deterrent is credible,” by actively promoting systems like missile defence or cyber attacks.

In that way, Trump’s move to throw down another $US4 billion on what experts agree is a failed concept may just be part of a magnificent bluff. Usually Trump criticises expensive projects with low rate of success, but he appears to have taken a shine to ballistic-missile defence.

North Korea knows the critics dismiss US ballistic-missile defence, but whether they’re willing to call that bluff is a separate question.

NOW WATCH: Briefing videos

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.