Thomson Reuters Not Rescuing The FT Or New York Times

f?id=49a55dd714b9b9ac0010f02c&maxX=287&m

Fresh off news that information giant Thomson Reuters (TRI) beat Wall Street expectations yesterday, speculation has mounted: Might either the troubled Financial Times (encouraging three-day work weeks) or the New York Times (whose problems are legend) be a good (and cheap!) fit in the Thomson Reuters organisation?

Nope.

On an earnings call yesteday, Reuters reporter Robert MacMillan asks his boss, Thomson Reuters CEO Tom Glocer, whether a Reuters-NY Times or Reuters-FT deal makes sense. Here’s Tom’s answer:

[Thomson was] so early in getting out of newspapers that now to go back in when our business model is so focused on professionals and so overwhemingly electronic doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. … If there were a fantastic information product that was 95 per cent electronic and 5 per cent a print output device, we would do it — maybe — if it otherwise made sense. I’m not convinced that we know how to run a newspaper any better than the ones running them today.

So if the NY Times is looking for white knight, keep looking.

Disclaimer: I used to write for Reuters.

NOW WATCH: Tech Insider videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at research.businessinsider.com.au.