- SpaceX has launched nearly 900 Starlink internet satellites, with plans for a constellation of 12,000 to 42,000 spacecraft this decade.
- The company says its satellites can avoid collisions using an ion drive, but about 2.5% may have failed because they are no longer manoeuvring in orbit, according to astronomer Jonathan McDowell.
- Orbiting satellites that can’t be manoeuvred can crash into other spacecraft and generate dangerous space debris.
- Until recently the apparent failure rate was about 3%, but new batches of Starlink spacecraft seem to have improved the average rate to around 2.5%.
- A roughly 2.5% failure rate isn’t too bad in the industry, McDowell says, but if that number holds for SpaceX’s entire planned fleet, it may lead to more than 1,000 dead satellites.
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
So far, the scheme â€” envisioned by SpaceX founder Elon Musk in 2015 â€” seems to be working. The aerospace company has even opened a public beta test across the northern US and southern Canada for $US99 a month, plus $US499 for a startup kit.
“Other countries to follow as soon as we receive regulatory approval,” Musk tweeted on October 8.
However, the unprecedented project has left a trail of seemingly unresponsive spacecraft in its wake. All of the satellites are designed to be manoeuvrable in space using an ion engine, and even deorbit themselves to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere. But satellites with malfunctioning communication or propulsion systems can fly uncontrolled and pose a hazard to other satellites, and even astronauts, circling Earth.
SpaceX launched its first batch of 60 prototypes in May 2019 and, to date, has flown 895 total Starlink internet satellites. But so far around 2.5% of those spacecraft may have failed, according to data collected by Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics.
“I would say their failure rate is not egregious,” McDowell told Business Insider in early October. “It’s not worse than anybody else’s failure rates. The concern is that even a normal failure rate in such a huge constellation is going to end up with a lot of bad space junk.”
Some of those failures may be intentional tests, but how many (if any) is not publicly known because SpaceX hasn’t released such information. As a result, astronomers like McDowell have resorted to analysing satellite-movement data gleaned from SpaceX and the US government, showing which Starlink satellites have fallen back toward Earth and which ones are not manoeuvring. (McDowell’s failure calculations do not include 45 “version 0.9” satellites that SpaceX is known to have intentionally deorbited.)
Before the end of October, McDowell was measuring a 3% apparent failure rate, but a recent reanalysis indicates improvement in the newest Starlink batches. Of the last 413 “version 1.0” satellites, only one appears to have died, giving these batches a failure rate of just 0.2%. Still, McDowell notes that many of these satellites have only been in space for a few months, so more of them are likely to fail going forward.
“Nevertheless it does seem that the reliability of the satellites has noticeably increased,” he tweeted on October 29.
SpaceX has permission from the US government to launch nearly 12,000 Starlink satellites through 2027, though it’s asked to launch 30,000 more for a total of nearly 42,000. In either case, SpaceX is on track to form a “megaconstellation” that outnumbers all prior spacecraft ever launched by humanity. If 3% of the maximum planned Starlink constellation fails, that could mean 1,260 dead, 550-pound satellites the size of a desk aimlessly circling the planet. A 2.5% failure rate could mean more than 1,000 inoperative spacecraft.
There were about 3,200 nonfunctional satellites in Earth’s orbit as of February, according to the European Space Agency. Many of these dead spacecraft regularly threaten to collide with others and create a space-debris crisis. In mid October, for example, satellite trackers flagged a “very high risk” close pass between a dead satellite and a discarded rocket body, with one company calculating a 10% chance of collision. (Fortunately, they didn’t.)
SpaceX says its satellites will naturally deorbit, or burn up in Earth’s atmosphere, if their propulsion systems don’t work. But that process can take up to five years, according to Starlink’s website. In the meantime, defunct satellites rocket around Earth faster than a bullet, with nobody to steer them away from other spacecraft that may fly in their path.
SpaceX did not acknowledge Business Insider’s requests for comment. However, in filings to the Federal Communications Commission, SpaceX has downplayed the risk, stating that it “views satellite failure to deorbit rates of 10 or 5 per cent as unacceptable, and even a rate of 1 per cent is unlikely.”
If 1% of its satellites did fail with no capacity to manoeuvre, the company said, “there is approximately a 1 per cent chance per decade that any failed SpaceX satellite would collide with a piece of tracked debris.”
The company also claimed that its practices “effectively eliminate the chance that such rates will ever occur.”
Dead satellites can collide and build up a space-debris crisis
SpaceX is not alone in pushing to launch large numbers of internet satellites. OneWeb, which the UK government recently purchased out of bankruptcy, has already launched 74 satellites for its proposed constellation of 48,000, while Amazon aims to launch more than 3,200 for its Kuiper fleet. It’s unclear how many dead satellites those constellations might also leave in orbit.
Since nobody can manoeuvre them, failed satellites sometimes hurtle toward other spacecraft â€” including the International Space Station and its crew of astronauts.
Even if a satellite crashes into another satellite with no humans on board, it can create perilous conditions.
“We replace two satellites with essentially two shotgun blasts of debris,” Dan Ceperley, the CEO of satellite-tracking company LeoLabs, told Business Insider in January. That month, two dead satellites almost crossed paths and exploded into hundreds of thousands of bits of debris.
It wouldn’t have been the first such explosion, and it doesn’t take many to exacerbate the debris problem. In 2007, China tested an anti-satellite missile by obliterating one of its own weather satellites. Two years later, one American and one Russian spacecraft accidentally collided. Those two events alone increased the amount of large debris in low-Earth orbit by about 70%.
India conducted its own anti-satellite missile test in 2019, and the explosion created an estimated 6,500 pieces of debris larger than an eraser.
All in all, more than 500 such “fragmentation events” have created nearly 130 million bits of debris in Earth’s orbit. Those chunks of debris zip around the planet at more than 17,500 mph, or roughly 10 times the speed of a bullet.
That’s not only a problem for robotic spacecraft, but ones carrying people. Just last month, a piece of debris careened within a mile of the football field-sized space laboratory. To avoid a collision, mission controllers fired the thrusters of an attached Russian cargo spaceship to manoeuvre the station out of possible harm’s way. The three crew members sealed themselves inside an ISS segment with a Soyuz spaceship, so they could escape if the debris struck.
If the space-junk problem gets extreme, a chain of collisions could spiral out of control and surround Earth in a practically impassable field of debris. This possibility is known as the Kessler syndrome, after Donald J. Kessler, who worked for NASA’s Johnson Space Centre and calculated in a 1978 paper that it could take hundreds or even thousands of years for such debris to clear up enough to make spaceflight safe again.
“It is a long-term effect that takes place over decades and centuries,” Ted Muelhaupt, who leads The Aerospace Corporation’s satellite system analysis, previously told Business Insider. “Anything that makes a lot of debris is going to increase that risk.”
The sheer number of objects in Earth’s orbit may already be having a Kessler-like effect, as Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck described last week.
“This has a massive impact on the launch side,” he told CNN Business, adding that rockets “have to try and weave their way up in between these [satellite] constellations.”
Starlink is already a space-debris hazard
SpaceX has barely launched 2% of its planned constellation, but it has already had a close call.
In September 2019, the European Space Agency had to manoeuvre one of its spacecraft at the last minute to avoid possibly colliding with a Starlink satellite. The chance of that crash was 1 in 1,000. While that may sound low, NASA routinely moves the ISS for chances of 1 in 100,000.
The ESA said it had to move its satellite because SpaceX had “no plan to take action.” SpaceX said it missed the ESA emails about the issue due to a “bug” in its communications systems.
Overall, close approaches like that seem to be happening more frequently.
“We are seeing recently a decided uptick in the number of conjunctions,” Dan Oltrogge, an astrodynamicist at Analytical Graphics, Inc, where he uses a software that has been assessing conjunction data since 2005, told Business Insider. “And it looks to be very well aligned with the new large-constellation spacecraft that have been launched.”
As new satellite constellations launch, regulatory agencies like the FCC may need to evaluate how many dead spacecraft they’re willing to accept.
“What is an acceptable failure rate?” McDowell said. “That, I’m maybe not competent to have an opinion on.”
This story has been updated with new information. It was originally published on October 16, 2020.
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.