A $43,000 secure phone booth and a 24-hour security detail -- Pruitt has taken extraordinary measures to protect himself from potential enemies

Russian President Vladimir Putin. Picture: Getty Images

The Environmental Protection Agency spent nearly $US43,000 to install a soundproof phone booth in administrator Scott Pruitt’s office, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

When news of the unprecedented phone booth first surfaced last year, it was believed to have cost $US25,000. At the time, Pruitt argued the Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF, as he called it, was “necessary for me to be able to do my job.”

But new invoices obtained by the watchdog group American Oversight show the phone booth actually cost taxpayers much more.

This isn’t the first time a questionable security measure at the EPA has drawn the ire of taxpayers and some lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

Here are six other times Pruitt’s EPA has taken a tough approach to security.


Pruitt limited employee access to his office

Upon assuming his position as the head of the EPA, Pruitt reportedly locked the doors to the floor where his office is located and implemented a new rule that requires agency employees to have an escort to gain entrance.

Some employees, according to a New York Times report last August, said they weren’t allowed to bring their mobile phones with them to meetings with Pruitt. Sometimes, the Times said, they sometimes weren’t allowed to take notes either.

“There’s a feeling of paranoia in the agency – employees feel like there’s been a hostile takeover, and the guy in charge is treating them like enemies,” Christopher Sellers, a professor at Stony Brook University, told the Times.

An EPA spokeswoman called the allegations “rumours.”


The EPA approved a 24-hour security detail to protect Pruitt

Pruitt is the first EPA chief to have round-the-clock security.

Last year, as the agency planned to hire a dozen more agents to protect Pruitt, the EPA’s inspector general announced he would look into whether the excess security was a necessity or a waste of taxpayer money, CNN reported at the time.

But Pruitt’s office argues the security is needed.

“We have at least four times – four to five times the number of threats against Mr. Pruitt than we had against Ms. McCarthy,” assistant inspector general Patrick Sullivan told CNN, referring to Gina McCarthy, who served as the EPA administrator during former President Barack Obama’s second term.


The EPA paid for a surveillance sweep of Pruitt’s office

Last March, the EPA paid $US3,000 to a contractor to do a sweep of Pruitt’s office to make sure there weren’t any covert or illegal surveillance devices.

Pruitt’s spokesman, Jahan Wilcox, defended the sweep by pointing to the “unprecedented amount of threats against [Pruitt],” according to The Hill.

Wilcox also said former Obama-era EPA chief Lisa Jackson had a similar security sweep while she was in office, but a former EPA employee who worked with Jackson told The Hill that she never personally requested it.


Pruitt doesn’t release his schedule ahead of time

Pruitt has also been coy about announcing his official government trips.

In an interview with The Washington Post, EPA spokeswoman Liz Bowman said the agency doesn’t release Pruitt’s schedule ahead of time “due to security concerns.”

When Business Insider’s Rebecca Harrington visited Earth Day Texas in April 2017, event organisers didn’t confirm Pruitt was coming to speak until two hours before he was rumoured to appear.

Pruitt has also been criticised for taking expensive trips abroad. Last year, for example, a four-day trip to Morocco cost taxpayers roughly $US40,000.

In December, Democratic Sen. Tom Carper sent a letter to the EPA’s inspector general requesting an audit of Pruitt’s travels to “determine whether his activities during each trip are in line with EPA’s mission to ‘protect human health and the environment.'”


The EPA hired a contractor that targeted employee emails

In December, The New York Times published a report detailing the EPA’s decision to hire Definers Public Affairs, a Virginia-based consulting firm, to monitor media coverage of the agency.

But some EPA employees complained that the firm was actually being used to track the communications of those critical of Pruitt and President Donald Trump.

For example, one employee based in Philadelphia said his emails were targeted by a FOIA request, initiated by Definers Public Affairs, one week after he took part in a rally against proposed EPA budget cuts.

“What they are doing is trying to intimidate and bully us into silence,” Gary Morton, the employee, told The Times.

The EPA said the firm was hired to do the agency’s press clips and denied any wrongdoing.


Pruitt flies first-class due to security threats

Pruitt’s frequent use of first-class airfare has also come under scrutiny.

In an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader newspaper last month, Pruitt justified paying more to fly first-class, even for trips that are often not entirely relevant to his work as a Cabinet official.

“We’ve had some incidents on travel dating back to when I first started serving in the March-April timeframe,” Pruitt said. “We live in a very toxic environment politically, particularly around issues of the environment.”

He also said he is not directly involved in security decisions.

In one example that has come under the microscope, Pruitt spent more than $US1,600 on a first-class plane ticket from Washington to New York in June 2017 in order to make two brief television appearances to promote the president’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

The Washington Post reported that his ticket cost more than six times what two of his aides paid to sit in coach.

NOW WATCH: Briefing videos

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.