Saudi Arabia is risking the economic health of weaker oil producing nations in its fight to see off the threat of the US shale boom.
Oil prices have fallen by over 30% since June and appear to be continuing their decline. On Thursday Brent fell to a four-year low of just over $US76 a barrel, down from $US115 a barrel in June, while US WTI crude dropped to around $US72 a barrel.
The collapse has taken a heavy toll on states that rely heavily on exports of the commodity to support their economies.
Below is a chart from Citi Group of the fiscal break even oil prices (the price at which revenues from oil sales will allow the government to meet its spending commitments) for a selection of oil exporting countries both within and outside of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).
What should be clear is that, although Saudi Arabia’s breakeven point has been creeping higher it remains substantially below some of the more vulnerable members.
Unfortunately for most of the countries on that list, most forecasters now predict that the days of $US100 a barrel oil are now over — at least for now. In a recent note Goldman Sachs estimates that Brent crude will hit $US90 again by 2016 with US WTI crude bouncing back up to $US80.
This forecast in large part reflects the huge shale boom that the US is experiencing. The country has seen production increase dramatically over the past couple of years, easily overwhelming cuts from OPEC members over recent years. And yet, the Saudi oil minister has been hinting that OPEC may not agree a cut to production at its key meeting on Thursday.
And here’s why that’s a problem…
Already this year Venezuela, Nigeria and Russia have burnt through billions of dollars in efforts to support collapsing currencies and flagging economies.
Russian international reserves have plummeted by $US90 billion since the start of the year spent mostly in foreign exchange markets trying to prop up the rouble. Despite decades of commitments to diversify its economy, oil still accounts for 10% of the country’s GDP and around 50% of federal budget revenue.
Morgan Stanley estimates that “every $US10 fall in the oil price means a $US32.4 billion fall in oil and gas exports, which is equivalent to about 1.6% of GDP” and around a $US19 billion fall in government budget revenues.
Elsewhere Nigeria finally conceded defeat in defending its currency, with the central bank devaluing the naira by 8% and increasing rates sharply on Wednesday. Investors have turned against the currency as Nigeria imports around 80% of the goods it consumers with 95% of its foreign currency earning coming through oil exports. Falling oil prices means the cost of those imports has become a lot steeper.
And for Venezuela the situation is simply dire. According to state-run oil company Petroleos de Venezuela the country looses $US700 million for each $US1 a barrel decline in oil prices, a cost that the ailing state can ill afford. Adjusted for inflation the country’s real GDP remains 2% below its 1970 level and, according to US academics Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, it is now all-but-certain to default on its foreign-currency debt.
Iraq and Iran are also vulnerable to sharp price drops. Production in the former at risk due to the threat of Islamic State militants seizing additional territory, including key oil infrastructure. In November forces loyal to the Iraqi government succeeded in forcing IS militants out of the Baiji refinery in northern Iraq, which the had earlier captured. These risks mean the cost of extraction and refining is high.
Iran is also vulnerable due to international sanctions imposed over the country’s nuclear programme. Last month President Hassan Rouhani announced that Iran’s oil revenues had dropped 30% as demand slowed in its major export market, China. Rouhani said that the country would have to “deal with the new conditions and the global economic conditions“.
So why isn’t Saudi Arabia acting to help its fellow oil producers?
One theory is that the Saudis are deliberately allowing prices to fall in order to fight off competition from US shale oil and maintain its share of the US market. Undoubtedly, it has come under pressure in what is a major part of the market and keeping prices below $US100 a barrel will put pressure on higher cost US shale producers.
However, there may be a more fundamental shift going on in the oil market at the moment. The problem for OPEC is that it may no longer be able to control prices (as it has in the past) to avoid these problems.
Previously, OPEC members would agree to cut oil production if falling prices posed a threat. That may now have changed because of the shale oil boom in the US, which has dramatically increased supply.
As Goldman Sachs wrote in a recent note (emphasis added):
[There is a] realisation that the OPEC reaction function has changed and that the US shale barrel is now likely the first swing barrel … When Saudi Arabia cut prices to Asia for November delivery it was interpreted as a shift in the Saudi reaction function to a focus on market share. This should have not been a surprise in the new world of shale that has flattened the supply curve, as economic game theory suggests that they should not be the first mover and that the US shale barrel should be the new swing barrel given how easily it can be scaled up and down.
This may explain Saudi Arabia’s unusual hints that it is now comfortable with sub-$US90-a-barrel oil prices — it doesn’t want to admit that its power to shift the price is drying up.
NOW WATCH: Briefing videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.