David Rosenberg Is Looking For The 'Holy Grail' Of Risk-Adjusted Return

david rosenberg munk debates 3

While most sell-side analysts are correctly classified as perma bulls, Gluskin Sheff’s David Rosenberg has been branded as the opposite – a perma bear.  He rejects that label. He recently said he’s indeed bullish – on bonds and income – and has been so for quite a while.

Defending that label, Rosenberg asserted that his goal is the “holy grail” of risk-adjusted return.  He defined risk in terms of capital preservation.  “But when you talk about risk, you are labelled a permabear,” he said.

Rosenberg spoke on May 3 at the Strategic Investment Conference in San Diego, hosted by John Mauldin and Altegris Investments.  Rosenberg is chief economist and chief strategist at Gluskin Sheff, a Canadian wealth manager.  Rosenberg also spoke at that conference last year, when he offered the same investment advice. 

Following his advice then would have been a good decision.  During 2011, 30-year Treasury bonds earned 25% returns and the 30-year Treasury strip returned a remarkable 80%.  Dow utilities – a sector Rosenberg recommended – calling them “bonds in drag” – were the top-performing stocks in the US market. 

Rosenberg’s now forecasts sustained deflation driven by a very weak economy, and he recommended increased allocations to Treasury, corporate and municipal bonds, as well as dividend-paying stocks.

I’ll discuss Rosenberg’s updated investment recommendations, but first let’s look at his economic forecast for 2012 – which is much more bearish than his outlook last year.

Beware of a “big recession” in 2013

At this point following a recession, we are normally at the strongest stage in the business cycle, when the Fed should be raising rates, Rosenberg said.   But that is not the case.  A year ago, the forecast was for 3% GDP growth, but 2011 ended with a disappointing 1.5%.

Now, the underlying trend is 2% growth, Rosenberg said.

And the economy faces more peril.  Rosenberg termed the 42 tax provisions that expire at the end of this year – including the Bush tax cuts – a “fiscal cliff.”  That cliff represents a 4% drag on economic growth, which would translate to a 2% contraction in GDP.

 “We will be in a big recession next year,” he said.  “Whether or not the government will let that happen – I don’t know.”

He said there is “no possible way” that the government could implement a fiscal stimulus that would offset that contraction.  Austerity is necessary, he said, “notwithstanding the pain it will cause.”  Canada underwent such a program 20 years ago, he said, and its economy emerged much stronger.

Twice before – in 1960 and in 1969 – the US government experienced a fiscal cliff similar to what will happen at the end of this year, Rosenberg said.  In both cases, a recession ensued. 

“Don’t dismiss those odds,” he said.  “The economy went into reverse.”

Rosenberg added that recessions most often happen in the first year of a presidential term, because presidents prefer to “get over with the bad news.”

Read the rest at Advisor Perspectives.com

NOW WATCH: Money & Markets videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at research.businessinsider.com.au.