- Prince Harry has been criticised for working with Netflix, the same streaming service that produces “The Crown,” which highlights his parents’ failed marriage in its fourth season.
- Princess Diana is at the centre of the historical drama’s latest episodes, which premiered on Netflix on Sunday.
- Piers Morgan said Harry is “hypocritical” for working with the company after previously pointing out the intrusive treatment his mother received at the hands of the media.
- Meanwhile, royal historian Hugo Vickers told Insider: “Netflix has bought a member of the royal family, and that’s extremely unattractive.”
- Harry and Markle signed on to produce documentaries, films, and scripted television for Netflix back in September.
- Visit Insider’s homepage for more stories.
The Duke of Sussex has been criticised for signing a production deal with Netflix, the same streaming service that produces “The Crown.”
The show’s fourth season, which premiered on Netflix on Sunday, introduces Princess Diana (Emma Corrin) for the first time, and focuses on her relationship with Prince Charles (Josh O’Connor), and the subsequent struggles they faced throughout their marriage, as well as Diana’s struggle with an eating disorder.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle signed on to create documentaries, docu-series, feature films, scripted television shows, and children’s programming for Netflix back in September. Their first project for the streaming service is yet to be officially announced.
Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan, who has been known to criticise the couple in the past, said Harry’s decision to work with Netflix is “hypocritical.”
“Harry is literally accepting money made from humiliating his own family, especially his own mother whose experience with the press he constantly holds up to demand greater deference for his wife Meghan,” Morgan wrote in his column for the Mail Online.
Morgan didn’t elaborate on the comparisons between Harry’s late mother and his wife. However, it’s possible he was referring to the duke’s now-famous announcement about the duchess’ lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday, where he said his “deepest fear is history repeating itself.”
“I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces,” Harry said in a statement released in October 2019, after the Mail published excerpts from a private letter Markle wrote to her father.
Morgan added: “And now, as a storm of controversy grows over this appallingly hypocritical decision, he’s shut his eyes, stuck his hands over his ears, and buried himself into the sands of Santa Barbara in the desperate hope nobody will notice the astoundingly two-faced nature of his behaviour.”
The show’s fourth season has been criticised for inaccuracies in its portrayal of the love triangle between Charles, Diana, and Camilla Parker-Bowles.
“Charles really did make a huge effort in the early days to accommodate her [Diana],” Hugo Vickers, a royal historian and author of “The Crown Dissected,” told Insider. “[The show] is so one-sided. The house of Windsor has been turned into a bunch of people who crush individuals who don’t comply with them, but that’s not fair.”
Royal editor Emily Andrews shared a similar opinion, writing in the Mail on Sunday: “So when Camilla is portrayed as selfish, scheming and poisonous; Charles as egotistical, callous and weak, their love affair destroying the innocent Diana, viewers are encouraged to believe this is true. But these are real people, living complex lives, who have been shabbily reduced to dramatic stereotype to titillate the paying viewer.”
She added: “The unedifying impression is that, by having signed a deal with Netflix, Prince Harry and his former Hollywood star wife Meghan are seen to be lavishly benefiting from the company’s distortion of the truth about the Royal Family.”
Vickers said Harry’s latest career move will be “damaging” to his reputation.
“I think it’s very damaging to him, because of course he wouldn’t have seen the series when he made his deal with Netflix. I don’t know the nature of the deal â€” we were told something like he was going to get $US100 million, but I doubt it,” Vickers told Insider. “The basic truth, at the end of the day, is that Netflix has bought a member of the royal family, and that’s extremely unattractive.”
Vickers added that the timing of the Netflix deal could also damage the duke’s reputation.
He said Harry could be seen as neglecting the British people during the coronavirus pandemic, when other royals were highlighting the efforts of healthcare staff by taking part in the UK’s “clap for carers,” a weekly tradition formerly carried out by the British public to applaud the NHS during the height of the pandemic.
“That was the moment we needed Prince Harry the most. And where was he? Sitting in Los Angeles contemplating a deal with Netflix,” Vickers said.
Representatives for Netflix and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex declined to comment when contacted by Insider.
- Read more:
- Nigeria’s Prince Kunle says Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Netflix careers will only be successful if they respect royal tradition
- ‘The Crown’ star Emma Corrin says Princess Diana’s history is repeating itself with Meghan Markle
- 5 moments in ‘The Crown’ that didn’t actually happen in real life