Continuing its downward shift from the week before, crude oil fell sharply on Monday, April 18 after S&P lowered its U.S. credit outlook to negative, and OPEC said high crude prices could pressure global economy. ICE Brent crude for June fell $1.84 to settle at $121.61 a barrels, while WTI (West Texas Intermediate) for May delivery also fell $2.54 to settle at $107.12 on NYMEX.
Crude oil dropped 2.8% in the week ending April 15, which marked the first weekly decline in a month. The sell off could be partly attributed to Goldman Sachs telling clients on Monday April 11 to sell, sell, sell “CCCP” commodities basket for a 25% profit, which prompted a broad selloff in commodities not just limited to crude oil.
CCCP is a commodity basket Goldman first recommended to clients in December 2010. The weight of the CCCP basket is allocated as 40% in crude oil, 20% in copper, 10% soybeans, 10% cotton and 20% in platinum.
Goldman – Brent to Correct Towards $105
Goldman’s primary thesis for its new found bear is centered around crude oil citing the similar market fundamentals observed in my WTI correction to $90 call about two weeks earlier:
- “Nascent signs of oil demand destruction in the United States,”
- “Record speculative length in the oil market”, and
- “A potential cease-fire in Libya”
Goldman believes the confluence of these factors could begin to offset some of the upside owing to “potential contagion risk in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)”. Furthermore, Goldman predicts Brent would correct towards $105 a barrel in coming months.
As discussed in my analysis on April 11, demand is starting to show weakness in Europe as gasoil storage reached a 3-month high boosted by imports, and a lack of demand from the agricultural sector. As such, Goldman also recommends clients to close long positions in the ICE gas oil (diesel and other distillate fuels) contracts.
BofA – Brent to Top $140 in 3 Months
However, not all agree with Goldman. BofA Merrill Lynch, for example, has a total opposite view on crude. Bloomberg quoted a Merrill report dated April 12 that BofA expects Brent futures to top $140 a barrel in the next 3 months “as consumption expands rapidly” and “armed conflict curbs supplies from Libya”, there even was a 30% chance Brent Crude could hit $160 a barrel.
Gloves Off at Barclays
Barclays also took a shot at Goldman suggesting that the call for a top of the oil and commodities market was not only “too early” but also “simplistic.” From FT.com:
“Without mentioning Goldman by name, Barclays’ team said that calling the top of the oil market was an opportunistic way to “guarantee a few short-term headlines, and some more headlines later when that view was reversed”
FT also quoted Paul Horsnell at Barclays as saying
“If analysis were to be judged solely in terms of the weight of headlines generated and their impact on the petroleum paparazzi, then following a route of frequent turns in a basic view might well be the best way to proceed”
This is not the only occasion that the two investment houses have diverging views on market outlook and portfolio positions, but it certainly marks a rare head-on confrontation between the two heavy weights in the commodity trading business, which also has left investors in a quandary – Which one–Goldman or Barclays and BofA, has the better crystal ball on crude oil?
IEA – High Prices Dent Demand
Coincidentally, Goldman’s crude oil bear call came around the same time that the IEA (International Energy Agency) warns of high oil prices could hurt global economy. Although it maintains world oil demand outlook, in its Monthly Oil Market Report, the IEA notes “Preliminary January and February data suggest that high prices are already starting to dent demand growth,” and that “The surest remedy for high prices may ultimately prove to be high prices themselves.”
Saudi Arabia – “Market is oversupplied”
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s Oil Minister Ali al- Naimi said the global “market is oversupplied,” and confirmed the Kingdom had cut output by more than 800,000 barrels per day in March because of weak demand. Saudi’s production in February was 9,125,100 barrels a day, and dropped to 8,292,100 barrels in March, but April levels are expected to be a bit higher than that of March.
Reduced Demand from Japan & Europe
The drop in Saudi’ March production coincides with a decrease in demand from Japan as the country lost 29% of its refinery capacity after the 9.0 earthquake on March 11. Vice Minister of International Affairs Hideichi Okada also indicated that “The Japanese economic growth rate will decrease to some extent, and that means our demand will slow down.”
Moreover, al-Naimi said that Saudi Arabia sold 2 million barrels of new blends of oil it has developed to help replace Libyan barrels withheld from the market, “and there is plenty left.” Even Barclays acknowledges that the new Saudi blends have seen a “lukewarm response” from European refiners in an investor note on April 14.
U.S. Swimming in Crude
The demand destruction is clearly manifesting in the U.S. Crude oil inventory is now sitting at 359.3 million barrels as of April 8, up 1.6 million barrels from just a week ago and 5.3 million barrels from a year ago.
Demand for gasoline over the four weeks ended April 8 was 1.6% lower than a year ago, averaging nearly 9 million barrels a day, an 8-year low. U.S. refineries run also drastically dropped to 81.4% of total capacity on average, a 3% decline from the prior week.
What’s Wrong With This Picture?
So, let’s take a look at what’s wrong with this picture regarding the U.S. WTI crude oil:
There’s a drastic drop in gasoline demand (see demand chart), plenty of crude inventory and supplies, yet crude oil WTI marker and gasoline prices remain stubbornly high (see price chart) unfazed by the bearish supply and demand factors.
Chart Source: U.S. EIA
The high gasoline prices are now costing the U.S. consumers about $360 million more per day at the pump than a year ago. According to AAA, six states now have gasoline prices above $4 a gallon, which is considered the price tolerance threshold for consumer behaviour change.
As nothing cures high prices like high prices, particularly for an economic commodity like crude, crude oil along with gasoline prices would have to come down, as the current U.S. economy and jobs situation could not support these irrational juiced-up price levels.
Chindia Factor on Oil
China’s economy grew more-than-estimated 9.7% in the first quarter and inflation accelerated in March to a 32-month high, the fastest pace since 2008. China’s consumer prices rose 5.4% from a year earlier while industrial output also increased 14.8% year-on-year. Chinese Officials inflation target is to hold at 4% for the full year. So, this suggests Beijing’s efforts to rein in soaring costs are falling short, and more should be expected.
The same story goes with India. India’s central bank has also been battling to bring prices under control. Rising food and fuel costs at double digit escalation is part of the problem, despite eight interest rate increases in the past year by the Reserve Bank of India.
Goldman – Front Running The Inevitable
Goldman has been one of the most bullish on commodities and was the first investment bank predicting $100 oil in the summer of 2007, more than a year prior to oil peaking at $147. Just five months ago, Goldman said the world’s crude oil spare capacity could be wiped out by growing demand by the end of 2012.
It is hard to tell what prompted Goldman’s sudden and somewhat surprise bearish view. But based on supply and demand fundamentals discussed here, coupled with contract rollover pressuring WTI prices as Cushing storage is maxing out (by the way, Goldman’s call came a week before the WTI May contract expiration on Tuesday, April 19), it seems Goldman’s bear call is nothing more than front running the inevitable, as there are very few excuses left to push up the price oil much further.
BofA Merrill Lynch – Near Term Totally Off Base
Despite the slight drop in recent days, WTI price is still up about 25% from a year ago, and remains incompatible with the current global economic recovery progression. On that note, BofA Merrill Lynch’s call for Brent futures to top $140 a barrel–a 15% rise from Monday’s closing–in three months seems way off base on supply and demand fundamentals, or even from a speculative point of view.
Barclays – Long Term Reasonable
FT reported that Barclays expects oil prices would reach $185 a barrel by 2020. With increasing market volatility and uncertainty, it is very difficult to make prediction almost 10 years down the road, but from the current vantage point, Barclays oil price target in the long term seems reasonable, based on diminishing ‘easy oil’ resources, global demand outlook and oil E&P project cost inflation.
Marked Slowdown in 2nd Half of 2011
Amid rising food and oil prices, a lot more aggressive tightening could be expected from China and India, along with other emerging countries, and developed economies. Even the most dovish U.S. Fed would at least quit further stimulus after the completion of QE2 in June.
This most likely could result in a marked slowdown in global economic growth and fuel demand, as early as the second half of 2011. Then, instead of if and when, it is a matter of how bad the world economy, commodities, and commodities related investments would get hammered.