Sequels are taking over Hollywood. However, this isn’t a new thing.
If a movie does well, or if it is based off an existing property, the likelihood that it will get a sequel is very high. Some sequels are simply pale imitations of their predecessors.
Then, there are some sequels that take their source material and bring it to another level entirely. They expand the universes they are a part of, and make us all glad we got to spend more time with the characters.
With a new James Bond, “Hunger Games,” and “Star Wars” on the way, here are some sequels that outdid their predecessors:
Predecessor: '21 Jump Street' (2012)
A sequel to '21 Jump Street' was a bad idea, given that '21 Jump Street' itself was a bad idea to begin with. But like the original, '22 Jump Street' shatters all expectations, creating a meta sequel that is somehow funnier and more self-aware than the original. That is all thanks to Phil Lord and Chris Miller, the creative duo that turned a lot of 'bad' ideas (like 'The Lego Movie') into something great.
Predecessor: 'Evil Dead II' (1987)
The 'Evil Dead' series is so consistently good that even the remake,'Evil Dead,' is solid. It is hard to pick a favourite, but 'Army of Darkness' might be the most wildly imaginative and funny. The stop motion skeleton army has only become more endearing with time.
Soon, we will be getting a TV spinoff called 'Ash vs. Evil Dead.' As Ash (Bruce Campbell) would say, 'groovy.'
Predecessor: 'Frankenstein' (1931)
The original 'Frankenstein' is filled with iconic images, but it strips out a lot of the brilliance of Mary Shelley's novel. A sequel was certainly not necessary, but 'The Bride of Frankenstein' justifies its existence.
'The Bride of Frankenstein' is a horror movie that won't necessarily scare you, and that is fine. Stick around instead for a hilarious and moving scene where the Monster becomes friends with a blind hermit who teaches him how to smoke and drink.
Nearly 75 years later, and there still hasn't been a monster movie quite like 'The Bride of Frankenstein.'
Predecessor: 'Batman Begins' (2005)
By far the most memorable part of 'The Dark Knight' is the late Heath Ledger's Oscar winning performance as The Joker which is equal parts funny, terrifying, and unpredictable. Not to say that 'The Dark Knight' isn't great on its own, but it shows how great acting can elevate a movie.
'The Dark Knight' is far and away one of the best comic book adaptations of all time. It also helped that it had Christopher Nolan at the helm, who somehow pulled off a hospital explosion in a single take.
'The Dark Knight' has had a huge influence on pop culture, and it led to a lot of dark, gritty imitators who couldn't come close to pulling off the magic that Nolan and his cast and crew did here.
Predecessor: 'A New Hope' (1977)
Yeah, this one was a given.
With a different director at the helm, the 'Star Wars' franchise went in dark new directions. Plus, it includes what is possibly the greatest twist in cinematic history. Sorry, 'Citizen Kane' and Rosebud.
Predecessor: 'For a Few Dollars More' (1965)
One of the most iconic films about the American West is actually from Italy.
People might not realise that Sergio Leone's epic masterpiece is actually the third chapter in the fantastic Man with no Name Trilogy. That is because 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly' stands so well on its own. The only thing really linking the three films is the setting and the nameless cowboy (Clint Eastwood) in the lead.
'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly' is often best remembered for its iconic score by Ennio Morricone as well as the long, haunting silences that eventually lead to the greatest standoff in cinematic history.
Predecessor: 'The Godfather' (1972)
This is a tough one.
'The Godfather' is an essential masterpiece, arguably the greatest American film ever made. However, what sets its sequel apart is not watching Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) descend into madness and alienate everyone he loves, but rather it is watching a young Vito Corleone (Robert De Niro) rise to power. Nobody could ever argue that 'The Godfather: Part II' is an unnecessary sequel.
Predecessor: 'From Russia with Love' (1963)
'Goldfinger' was the first Bond movie to start incorporating gadgets into the plot. You could say that this movie is ultimately to blame for the technological mess that was 'Die Another Day,' but that wouldn't be fair.
And yet, 'Goldfinger' still manages to be a low key Bond film. It doesn't focus on a diabolical plot to destroy the world but rather, a high stakes bank robbery. Usually, sequels like to go bigger. 'Goldfinger' is the perfect example of what James Bond looked like before he went into outer space.
Predecessor: 'The Hunger Games' (2012)
Some people complain that 'Catching Fire' took too long to get to the actual games, but they spent that time wisely. Since the first movie got all of the exposition out of the way, 'Catching Fire' gets to focus on world building. It proves that this young adult series has an even darker view on the media and the future than anybody gives it credit for.
Predecessor: 'Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom' (1985)
Up until 2008, there was never a bad Indiana Jones movie. Even 'Temple of Doom' doesn't get the credit it deserves.
But 'The Last Crusade' is a truly fine piece of entertainment. It made the right choice of bringing back Nazi bad guys and recruiting Sean Connery to play Jones' father.
The opening of 'The Last Crusade,' which portrays a young Indiana Jones (played by the late River Phoenix), plays like a standalone short film. If they had just done that, and not even made the rest of the movie, this would still be the best Indiana Jones movie out there.
Predecessor: 'Kill Bill: Vol. 1' (2003)
'Kill Bill' was originally supposed to be one film, but Quentin Tarantino had to slice it in half. It surprisingly benefits from it. While 'Vol. 2' doesn't contain anything nearly as impressive as the climatic battle for 'Vol. 1,' it is a lot more intimate and character driven.
Bill's (David Carradine) monologue about Superman is about as good as any dialogue ever put onscreen. However, if it is action you are looking for, the much anticipated dual between The Bride (Uma Thurman) and Elle Driver (Daryl Hannah) does not disappoint.
Middle chapters of trilogies are typically the darkest. 'The Two Towers' is no exception. It is just a little more epic than 'The Fellowship of the Ring' without suffering from some of the Oscar winning 'The Return of the King.'
Predecessor: 'Spider-Man' (2002)
Instead of being an amped up version of the original, 'Spider-Man 2' is the rare sequel that tones down the action for what could be described as an existential super hero film. Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) spends most of the film wondering why he even wants to be Spider-Man.
Superhero movies have transformed and evolved in recent years, but 'Spider-Man 2' still remains at the top of the pack. However, it is also a sad reminder of the potential of this series that was sadly squandered.
The first 'Terminator' is a masterpiece in low budget filmmaking. It plays less like the kind of blockbusters we are all used to and more like a horror film.
The sequel, meanwhile, steps it up to 11 with eye-popping special effects which were groundbreaking during their time. Plus, it presented a unique acting challenge for star Arnold Schwarzenegger: he had to play the same character, but as the good guy instead of the bad guy. It is truly the heart of this film, and maybe the best performance he has ever given.
Predecessor: 'X-Men: First Class' (2011)
'Days of Future Past' is a sequel to a mediocre reboot, but it also might be the X-Men instalment ever. It combines time travel that is more fun than convoluted with a story that is surprisingly filled with heart. Come for the amazing Quicksilver scene, stay for the lessons on Civil Rights.
NOW WATCH: Ideas videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.