After Paula Wagner left United Artists, it created a bit of a void in terms of management of the MGM subsidiary, particularly since Tom Cruise, the highest-level remaining exec remarked two weeks after Wagner’s departure, “I don’t run United Artists; I just own it.”
But now it seems parent company MGM has filled that hole with production exec Mary Parent, who claims she’s not “running UA” either, but she is helping UA ramp up production so that the studio can stay within the terms of its $500 million fund set up by Merrill Lynch.
Indeed, Parent’s aggressive ability to greenlight movies is just what UA needs, and she’s already approved a number of films since she came onboard at MGM: movies that studio, according to some reports, doesn’t yet have the money to make. Wouldn’t it be easier to just funnel some of those projects into United Artists, the LA Times wonders?
We think that’s a brilliant way to save both studios.
LA Times: As if Mary Parent didn’t have enough to do trying to transform MGM from an also-ran into a studio that Hollywood can take seriously. Now, the former Universal Pictures executive who was hired in March to turn things around also has to help get movies made at MGM’s troubled smaller sister, United Artists —something recently departed CEO Paula Wagner apparently had trouble doing during her truncated tenure…
Since Wagner left, Parent has gotten a lot cozier with Tom Cruise, who along with Wagner, still owns a 30% stake in UA and remains involved creatively. Parent has been taking a lot of meetings with Cruise and has attended test screenings of the actor’s upcoming holiday release,
Parent isn’t trying to hide her deeper involvement in UA. “I’m more active than I was before, helping out wherever and whenever needed,” she says, while insisting, “I am not running UA.”
In a sense, Parent has to say that, even though she sure looks like the de facto head. MGM has to tread carefully when it comes to UA. Even though MGM owns 65% of UA and markets and distributes its films, the smaller studio has a $500-million movie fund, originally set up for Wagner and Cruise, that is specifically earmarked for UA films.
That may explain why MGM spokesman Jeff Pryor says, “There are no plans to replace Paula Wagner.” He described the relationship between Parent and UA as a “collaborative effort,” in which she works closely with Cruise and UA production president Don Granger and his team to get movies queued up.
Indeed, they’re under intense pressure to move quickly to keep the UA revolving fund active. The bank agreement with Merrill Lynch & Co. stipulates that specific release dates have to be met in order for UA to retain full access to the funds, which anticipates four films a year for five years. But since Wagner and Cruise were recruited to revive UA, the studio has released only a single film — the money loser and critically drubbed “Lions For Lambs.” And “Valkyrie,” due out Dec. 26, is the only other picture on UA’s release schedule.
But, hey, what’s to stop Parent from guiding some MGM projects UA’s way so they can take advantage of the UA fund and fill its near-bare cupboard? Parent declined to comment on that. But the charge-ahead executive has put together more than a dozen projects in her brief six months at MGM — and doesn’t yet have the funds to produce all the big-budget movies she wants to make.
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.