LEAKED: AT&T Didn't Want To Expand Rural Coverage Because Of $3.8 Billion Price Tag

AT&T HQ in SAn Antonio

Photo: AP Images

A leaked legal filingĀ  reveals that AT&T was happy to have its 4G network cover 80% of Americans, but didn’t want to spend the $3.8 billion needed to expand it to the rest of the country.Instead, it decided to spend almost 10 times that much to buy T-Mobile.

Wireless Week got a look at the letter from the FCC’s Web site before it was taken down. Here’s the relevant bit from an AT&T lawyer:

AT&T senior management concluded that, unless AT&T could find a way to expand its LTE footprint on a significantly more cost-effective basis, an LTE deployment to 80 per cent of the U.S. population was the most that could be justified.

That makes sense: rural areas are sparsely populated, so AT&T didn’t want to spend all that money building towers for so few people.

AT&T says the T-Mobile buy will help it spread the costs out over a larger revenue base.

But it doesn’t pass the sniff test: AT&T was too cheap to spend $3.8 billion expanding its existing network, but is willing to spend $39 billion on an entire company … to expand its network.

sceptics might argue that AT&T is really hoping the merger will suck up two competitors at once — T-Mobile and number-three Sprint, which won’t be able to compete with the newly massive AT&T.

AT&T vigorously denied that possibility to Wireless Week, saying that the merger was the only way it could afford to roll out 4G coverage to 97% of Americans.

NOW WATCH: Tech Insider videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at research.businessinsider.com.au.