In One Sentence, Here's Why The New Pay Disclosures From Goldman And Morgan Stanley Don't Matter

Photo: Travis Seitler

The Wall Street Journal has an article up describing how shareholders and the New York City Comptroller’s office, have forced Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley into additional disclosures on their compensation clawback policies.¬†Goldman and Morgan Stanley have clarified who clawback provisions apply to and what can trigger them.

Informative. But what should really stand out about the article is this sentence:

Michael Deutsch, an employment lawyer who specialises in Wall Street pay, said that despite clawbacks provisions’ prevalence, “the actual implementation of a clawback has been pretty rare.”

There you have the basic irrelevance of clawbacks, exposed in a single sentence: everyone talks about them, no one uses them.

That could change, but until it does, clawbacks will continue to largely be a sideshow that diverts from regulatory changes that will fundamentally change banks’ business models.

 

NOW WATCH: Money & Markets videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at research.businessinsider.com.au.