Huawei Gives Transparency A Try, Names Board Members

Huawei’s US expansion plans have been thwarted several times now by the US government. In addition to complaints about Huawei’s supposed ties to the People’s Liberation Army and its presence in the sensitive telecom sector, US critics have also cited its murky corporate structure.

I wrote about its latest rejection this past February:

The most recent blade sunk into Huawei’s expansionist guts came from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, a security review body commonly referred to as CFIUS, which recommended that Huawei divest itself of technology assets purchased from defunct tech firm 3Leaf last year. For several days, Huawei played it uncommonly tough, declining to go with the CFIUS fix, which would have forced President Obama to make the call. Well, yesterday they threw in the towel.

Why is this tragic? This is now the third time that Huawei’s US plans have been thwarted. They were first given the cold shoulder in 2008, when Huawei, and a group of other investors, tried to buy in to 3Com. CFIUS put the kibosh on that deal as well, resulting in a similar “voluntary” withdrawal by the Chinese company.

A couple years later, when US telecom company Sprint solicited bids for equipment needed for an upgrade of its cell phone network, Huawei (and fellow Chinese firm ZTE) participated, at least for a while. Ultimately it was 3Com all over again, furious gnashing of teeth were heard from the usual suspects in Washington, and the bids of the Chinese firms were tossed in the dust bin.

I ended that post with the pessimistic comment that this was Huawei’s “third strike,” suggesting that the future didn’t look all that bright for the telecom giant in the US. This gloomy viewpoint had more to do with Huawei’s particular problems than the fact that it is a Chinese enterprise — I wrote about that issue a couple of weeks ago.

But of course Huawei can’t just give up on the US market. What can it do to try and mend fences with the folks in DC? It can’t change its corporate history, and it’s stuck in a sensitive commercial sector. How about transparency?

Apparently Huawei has been listening to the complaints and is trying to allay US fears.

From the Financial Times:

Huawei has for the first time made public the members of its board, in an attempt to improve transparency in order to address US concerns about its alleged links to the Chinese military.

The biggest change in the Chinese telecoms equipment maker’s annual report for 2010, to be published on Monday, is that Huawei has included for the first time a list of names, pictures and biographies of the people who run the company.

Will this pave the way for future US deals for Huawei? I’d like to say yes, but after some of the statements I’ve read from US legislators, I have a feeling that some folks in D.C. made up their minds a while ago that Huawei is persona non grata. This latest goodwill gesture may not be enough to change those minds.

For more on the topic, you can listen to me and Josh Gartner talk Huawei and CFIUS on the China Policy Pod from last February.

NOW WATCH: Money & Markets videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at