Uber is the most valuable private tech company in the world right now.
In January, the company worked out a $US1.6 billion convertible-debt round with Goldman Sachs, bringing the total amount of money Uber has raised since its 2010 launch to more than $US4 billion and valuing the company at more than $US41 billion.
But Uber isn’t infallible. The company has competitors, it’s working through regulatory battles, and it relies on independent contractors. So we decided to look at some of the nightmare scenarios Uber could potentially find itself facing in the future.
In 2014, Uber put its foot in its mouth several times. In November at a dinner for 'influencers,' an Uber executive named Emil Michael suggested the company could theoretically dig up personal information on reporters who are critical of the company. BuzzFeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith then reported on those comments.
Lyft reported it had its best week ever during the same week that Uber's executives were caught up in all that drama. If that's any indication, future public relation blunders could cause public opinion of Uber to shift.
Uber relies heavily on a team of drivers, independent contractors who work for the company.
Groups of these drivers across the country have protested the company since September. They're upset with Uber's competitive pricing, which affects drivers' incomes. Some say they're barely making minimum wage. They don't understand why Uber hasn't integrated a feature to let them accept tips from customers. They're terrified of Uber's five-star rating system, and say that even one bad rating could be enough to knock them out of Uber's driving system and prevent them from driving for the service in the future.
Uber's drivers are volatile. They aren't required to work for Uber; they can stop and start whenever they want. They know they have options -- there are alternatives for them within the same space, like driving for Lyft, or Gett, or SideCar. Some could get out of the black-car driving game altogether. If Uber's drivers were to suddenly up and stop driving for the company, Uber might feel it.
Drivers are unpredictable, and can occasionally be a liability for Uber.
An Uber driver in San Francisco has been charged with vehicular manslaughter after killing a six-year-old girl in San Francisco on New Year's Eve last year. In September, an Uber driver was accused of smashing a passenger in the head with a hammer and driving away. That same month, an Uber driver in Orlando was accused of groping a female passenger and then blaming it on the way the woman was dressed.
The list of stories about Uber drivers behaving badly goes on. It's not unique to Uber -- taxi drivers don't always have a totally clean track record, either -- but city taxis aren't in the public eye like Uber is. Additionally, city taxi services usually don't promote themselves with the same level of security screenings that Uber promises to hold its drivers to.
Some customers who say they have been assaulted by drivers are taking legal action. A woman who was allegedly raped and beaten by her Uber driver in Delhi, India, is suing the company in US court. While Uber has the money and time to deal with lawsuits, they could still take a toll on the company.
Bloomberg has reported that Google is 'going to war' with Uber. According to Bloomberg, Google is actively seeking its own car-hailing technology. Google is also, famously, researching self-driving cars. Bloomberg's report indicated that this could topple Uber, bringing self-driving cars-on-demand to roads before Uber ever had a chance to get into autonomous cars.
The Wall Street Journal later reported that Google was simply testing an internal program, a carpooling service for its employees, and that the entire issue had been 'blown out of proportion.' Additionally, this internal service 'isn't associated with the company's driverless car program.'
In the future, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick says, its drivers will be replaced with driverless cars. Just this week Uber announced it was partnering with Carnegie Mellon University to research self-driving cars. But if Google could eventually get there first and do it just as well as Uber can, it would give Uber a run for its money.
Uber's December fundraising round -- in which Uber raised a massive $US1.2 billion -- was intended to allow Uber to 'make significant investments, particularly in the Asia Pacific region.'
However, an Asian-based car-hailing startup alliance could cripple Uber's efforts there.
BuzzFeed News reported that Softbank Capital, which has funded on-demand ride-hailing startups GrabTaxi and OlaCabs, was behind a global alliance to take on Uber.
Executives at both GrabTaxi and OlaCabs, which are Asia-based companies that use taxis instead of private drivers, told BuzzFeed News they're working on 'forming a global alliance of regional players.'
These executives also suggested to BuzzFeed News that Softbank Capital -- which has provided funding for both GrabTaxi and OlaCabs -- is behind the potential alliance. Ron Fisher, a partner at Softbank Capital, told BuzzFeed he couldn't comment.
Though Uber operates in a number of Asian markets, including Beijing, Bangkok, and Tokyo, Uber has faced obstacles in Asia. South Korea has vowed to shut down Uber's operations in the country. As TechCrunch notes, 'Korean law doesn't allow technology companies to store payment data as part of their purchase workflow, but instead requires consumers to retype their information with every purchase, ostensibly for security reasons.'
By providing a similar service that is familiar with local laws and cooperates with local governments, Softbank's taxi alliance could help keep Uber out of Asia, a huge potential market that relies heavily on taxi services.
Uber's aggressive business model has ostensibly helped it much more than it has hurt the company. It sets up business in cities without asking permission from local governments. Once it's up and running, Uber will either work with or in defiance of local government.
Last year Uber focused on its policy team, hiring former Obama strategist David Plouffe as its SVP of policy and strategy. This team has allowed Uber to expand into politics, effectively making Plouffe Uber's 'campaign manager.' Uber's policy team has most recently shed the company's aggressive image to work with cities as opposed to working in defiance of them. A recent example of this is Portland, Oregon. In December, Uber agreed to stop operating in Portland while city officials create new regulations for taxis.
But cities, states, and countries aren't universally welcome to working with Uber. Amid regulatory concerns, Nevada became the first US state to suspend Uber's operations.
Uber is having a different set of challenges in other countries, especially Germany: Uber's services aren't taking off there in part because the country's taxis are Mercedes, and thus much nicer than a typical American taxi. Germans don't seem enticed by a service like Uber even if it's much cheaper. In addition, courts in Hamburg and Berlin upheld a ban on the service in September, saying that Uber doesn't comply with German laws.
France has banned Uber's low-cost UberPop service. A Dutch court also ruled that in The Netherlands, Uber couldn't work with unlicensed drivers (drivers with licenses and drivers who don't seek payment can still legally operate, however).
This is all to say that if governments around the world continue cracking down on Uber, it could spell trouble for the company, which has emphasised its focus on international growth in the past year.
After its $US1.2 billion round of funding, Uber was valued at $US41 billion -- the highest valuation of any private company. As early as this year or next, Uber could go public. But some analysts say Uber's huge valuation could present the company with a lot of expectations Uber may struggle to meet.
One such expectation: 'Analysts say Uber must at least double its current market value at the time of its IPO to satisfy investors, which would put the company in the same league as Facebook, which was valued at $US104 billion at the time of its public offering,' says Heather Somerville, in a bearish story about Uber in the San Jose Mercury News.
Aswath Damodaran, a professor of finance at Stern School of Business at New York University, told the Mercury News: 'By raising this amount of money, they are setting themselves up to be the next Facebook. Does Uber have the potential to be the next Facebook? Absolutely. But keep in mind the first big disrupter might not always be the winner.'
Whe Uber files for its IPO -- which it will, especially given that the company reportedly has a deal with Goldman Sachs that says if Uber doesn't go public in four years it will have to pay interest to Goldman Sachs -- Uber will have to disclose its finances. Company filings may show that Uber's not growing as fast as investors thought it would.
As a public company, Uber will also not be allowed to make the same public relations missteps that it's made in the past.
Uber and one of its competitors, Lyft, are facing lawsuits brought on by drivers that could dramatically change the companies' business models.
Both lawsuits say the companies' drivers should be reclassified as employees as opposed to independent contractors. As independent contractors for Lyft and Uber, drivers pay all their expenses out of pocket: gas, maintenance, insurance, and detailing, just to name a few.
Startups use contractors for the simple reason that they are a lot cheaper than employees. When you're an independent contractor, your employer does not have to consider paying into Social Security or withholding taxes.
When the home-cleaning startup MyClean switched from an independent-contractor model to one with full-time employees, the startup saw its labour costs go up 40%, according to Kevin Roose, writing for New York magazine. If MyClean is any indication, Uber losing the lawsuit against its drivers would mean its labour costs would go way up.
The drivers, should they win these lawsuits, could be entitled to either hourly wages or a regular salary, as well as reimbursement for the money they have spent on things like gas and insurance as drivers for Uber and Lyft.
'If the judges rule against Uber and Lyft, it could significantly raise their costs beyond the lawsuits and force the companies to pay social security, workers' compensation, and unemployment insurance,' Reuters reports. In addition, drivers would be able to organise formally.
NOW WATCH: Tech Insider videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.