Inquiring minds might be interested in charts of GDP minus the effect of increased government spending. The charts are from reader Tim Wallace who writes …
Dear Mish –
Take a look at the following spreadsheets of GDP from 2001 to 2010, in chained 2005 dollars to account for [price] inflation.
U.S. GDP and Net GDP (subtracting government spending)
click on chart for sharper image
The above chart clearly demonstrates that there really is no recovery, just increased federal spending and debt.
Here are the GDP numbers chained to 2005 dollars (Millions):
Year GDP Gov’t Spending Net GDP 2001 11,371.3 2,056.4 9,314.9 2002 11,538.8 2,188.6 9,350.2 2003 11,738.7 2,303.3 9,435.4 2004 12,213.8 2,377.7 9,836.1 2005 12,587.5 2,486.0 10,101.5 2006 12,962.5 2,578.5 10,384.0 2007 13,194.1 2,570.1 10,624.0 2008 13,359.0 2,753.3 10,605.7 2009 12,810.0 3,210.8 9,599.2 2010 13,191.5 3,470.0 9,721.5
Note that the chained GDP number less the federal spending nets out to a number less than the GDP of 2004. So basically, our economy is back where it was seven years ago.
Private Sector GDP
click on chart for sharper image
Private sector GDP continues to shrink as the above chart and following table shows.
Year Private GDP% 2001 81.9% 2002 81.0% 2003 80.4% 2004 80.5% 2005 80.3% 2006 80.1% 2007 80.5% 2008 79.4% 2009 74.9% 2010 73.7%
Moreover, over 40% of government spending is deficit spending. That increase in deficit spending accounts for the alleged rebound in GDP. Clearly that deficit spending is unsustainable.
How much of that increased government spending made it into your pocket or benefited you in any way? While your are pondering that, remember that all government spending adds to GDP whether or not anything is actually produced.
The “Feels Bad” Recovery
These charts help explain Good News: The Great Recession is Over; Bad News: It Doesn’t Feel Like It.
So far, we do not even have an admission by the President, by Congress, or by most economists as to what the problems are. Instead everyone wants to “stimulate” something, typically by throwing money at problems.
This is why the problems are unlikely to be fixed, and this is why we are likely to remain in a stagnant economy that produces few jobs for the remainder of the decade.
While the recession is over, it certainly does not feel like it. Moreover, because we fail to address the structural issues, the odds of slipping back into another recession are exceptionally high.
Keynesian and Monetarist Stimulus Both Failures
Neither Keynesian stimulus (deficit spending) nor monetary stimulus (Quantitative Easing) have done anything to speed up the recovery. In regards to the latter, the QE Engine Revs, but the Car Goes Nowhere.
Just as happened in Japan, all we have to show for our stimulus is bigger and bigger deficits with a corresponding increase in the percentage of revenues needed to finance that debt.
All this talk of a “recovery” is nonsensical. Careful analysis shows the alleged recovery is nothing more than an illusion caused by unsustainable deficit spending. Meanwhile, the real economy is mired at the 2004 level. Simply put, the recovery “feels bad” because there is no recovery in the first place, only a statistical illusion of one.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List