Google Not Cheating: Knol Pages Buried Deep In Search Result Hell

One advantage Wikipedia has over Google’s Wikipedia-inspired Knol: Its entries still show up much higher in Google’s (GOOG) own search results.

This makes sense, of course — the longer-standing Wikipedia entries should have more inbound links, and ultimately a better Google rank. And Google has no incentive to juice the results to give its own product a boost — if it ever got caught, it would cause its brand irreparable harm.

How do some new knols compare to their Wikipedia counterparts? Wikipedia (SAI 25 #2) did particularly well for nouns like “lung cancer” and “sunscreen,” while Knol’s how-to articles like the much-ballyhooed “toilet clogs” and “how to backpack” don’t really have Wikipedia counterparts. Search ranking as of Thursday evening:

Search Query Wikipedia Knol type 1 diabetes 2 30 lung cancer 2 60 toilet clogs — 3 tooth pain — 14 how to backpack — 3 osteoporosis 3 383 sunscreen 1 >500 coleslaw 2 46 floating floors 6 >500 glögg 1 21 barbecue 1 37 knol 2 3 eclipse 5 >500Amusingly, if you search for “knol,” Wikipedia’s entry still comes up higher in Google’s search results than the Knol project homepage.

Earlier: Google Launches Wikipedia Killer “Knol”: Everything You Wanted To Know About Toilet Clogs, Tooth Pain, More

NOW WATCH: Tech Insider videos

Want to read a more in-depth view on the trends influencing Australian business and the global economy? BI / Research is designed to help executives and industry leaders understand the major challenges and opportunities for industry, technology, strategy and the economy in the future. Sign up for free at

Tagged In

google news sai-us