The FTC filed a claim Tuesday that says T-Mobile has been placing hidden charges in phone bills for premium third-party texting services that weren’t authorised by customers.
In a statement, the FTC says T-Mobile has made “hundreds of millions of dollars” through such charges.
The premium texting fees were for services that sent users messages like horoscopes, celebrity gossip, and flirting tips, the FTC says. Those services cost $US9.99 per month, but T-Mobile continued to charge customers for them even after it was determined that the charges were fraudulent, according to the charges. T-Mobile would keep about 40% of the charge and the rest would go to the texting service, according to the FTC.
The practice described by the FTC here is called “cramming,” meaning the carrier and texting services hide the charges in customer bills.
According to an FTC spokesperson, people typically sign up for such premium texting services through an online ad on their phone or a website. The services are supposed to ask for payment auhortization twice, but the FTC says that usually doesn’t happen. The third-party services have an agreement with T-Mobile to automatically charge customers on their bills.
According to the FTC, T-Mobile made it difficult for customers to tell who was charging them for the texting services. In this case, the FTC says T-Mobile made it tough for customers to view a breakdown of their bills online. The charges were often buried deep in customers’ bills and disguised with wonky labels like “8888906150BrnStorm23918.”
In some cases, the FTC says, T-Mobile said customers authorised the charges, but T-Mobile couldn’t provide proof of that. The FTC claims that T-Mobile should have been aware of fraudulent charges from the texting services because as many as 40% of affected customers asked for refunds.
In a phone conference with reporters, the FTC said it hopes its lawsuit forces T-Mobile to pay customers back for fraudulent charges and pust a ban on bill cramming throughout the industry. The FTC isn’t seeking a fine for T-Mobile, but it is trying to get T-Mobile to pay customers back. A separate investigation by the FCC could result in a fine for T-Mobile.
An FTC spokesperson said it tried to settle the case with T-Mobile out of court, but the two parties couldn’t reach an agreement. The spokesperson wouldn’t comment on whether or not other carriers are cramming phone bills too.
T-Mobile has seen a remarkable turnaround since its CEO John Legere took charge at the end of 2012. The company was nearly toast at the time, but Legere enacting a series of enticing offers to lure in new subscribers. For example, T-Mobile eliminated service contracts and lets customers pay for their smartphones off in monthly payments. T-Mobile is now the fastest growing wireless carrier in the U.S. and is on pace to surpass Sprint at the end of this year or early next year in terms of subscribers.
T-Mobile is a good target for the FTC in its battle against cramming. To be clear, T-Mobile probably isn’t the only carrier that’s cramming. But the company’s marketing message has been to eliminate “pain points” like contracts and overage charges. Filing charges against T-Mobile will likely resonate more with the public and draw more attention to cramming practices.
In a public statement, Legere said T-Mobile stopped billing for the premium texting services last year. He also said the company is in the process of refunding customers.
Here’s the full statement from Legere:
We have seen the complaint filed today by the FTC and find it to be unfounded and without merit. In fact T-Mobile stopped billing for these Premium SMS services last year and launched a proactive program to provide full refunds for any customer that feels that they were charged for something they did not want. T-Mobile is fighting harder than any of the carriers to change the way the wireless industry operates and we are disappointed that the FTC has chosen to file this action against the most pro-consumer company in the industry rather than the real bad actors.
As the Un-carrier, we believe that customers should only pay for what they want and what they sign up for. We exited this business late last year, and announced an aggressive program to take care of customers and we are disappointed that the FTC has instead chosen to file this sensationalized legal action. We are the first to take action for the consumer and I am calling for the entire industry to do the same.
This is about doing what is right for consumers and we put in place procedures to protect our customers from unauthorised charges. Unfortunately, not all of these third party providers acted responsibly — an issue the entire industry faced. We believe those providers should be held accountable, and the FTC’s lawsuit seeking to hold T-Mobile responsible for their acts is not only factually and legally unfounded, but also misdirected.
Here’s the full statement from the FTC:
In a complaint filed today, the Federal Trade Commission is charging mobile phone service provider T-Mobile USA, Inc., with making hundreds of millions of dollars by placing charges on mobile phone bills for purported “premium” SMS subscriptions that, in many cases, were bogus charges that were never authorised by its customers.
The FTC alleges that T-Mobile received anywhere from 35 to 40 per cent of the total amount charged to consumers for subscriptions for content such as flirting tips, horoscope information or celebrity gossip that typically cost $US9.99 per month. According to the FTC’s complaint, T-Mobile in some cases continued to bill its customers for these services offered by scammers years after becoming aware of signs that the charges were fraudulent.
“It’s wrong for a company like T-Mobile to profit from scams against its customers when there were clear warning signs the charges it was imposing were fraudulent,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. “The FTC’s goal is to ensure that T-Mobile repays all its customers for these crammed charges.”
In a process known as “third-party billing,” a phone company places charges on a consumer’s bill for services offered by another company, often receiving a substantial percentage of the amount charged. When the charges are placed on the bill without the consumer’s authorization, it is known as “cramming.”
The FTC’s complaint alleges that in some cases, T-Mobile was charging consumers for services that had refund rates of up to 40 per cent in a single month. The FTC has alleged that because such a large number of people were seeking refunds, it was an obvious sign to T-Mobile that the charges were never authorised by its customers. As the complaint notes, the refund rate likely significantly understates the percentage of consumers who were crammed. The complaint also states that internal company documents show that T-Mobile had received a high number of consumer complaints at least as early as 2012.
The FTC has made significant efforts to end mobile cramming. In the last year, in addition to holding a public workshop on mobile cramming, the Commission has filed several lawsuits against alleged mobile cramming operations Jesta Digital, Wise Media, and Tatto Inc. According to today’s complaint, T-Mobile billed its customers for the services of these FTC defendants as well as an operation sued by the Texas Attorney General.
The complaint against T-Mobile alleges that the company’s billing practices made it difficult for consumers to detect that they were being charged, much less by whom. When consumers viewed a summary of their T-Mobile bill online, according to the complaint, it did not show consumers that they were being charged by a third party, or that the charge was part of a recurring subscription. The heading under which the charges would be listed, “Premium Services,” could only be seen after clicking on a separate heading called “Use Charges.” Even after clicking, though, consumers still could not see the individual charges.
The complaint also alleges that T-Mobile’s full phone bills, which can be longer than 50 pages, made it nearly impossible for consumers to find and understand third-party subscription charges. After looking past a “Summary” section as well as an “Account Service Detail” section, both of which described “Usage Charges” but did not itemize those charges, a consumer might then reach the section labelled “Premium Services,” where the crammed items would be listed.
According to the complaint, the information would be listed there in an abbreviated form, such as “8888906150BrnStorm23918,” that did not explain that the charge was for a recurring third-party subscription supposedly authorised by the consumer. In addition, the complaint notes that consumers who use pre-paid calling plans do not receive monthly bills, and as a result the subscription fee was debited from their pre-paid account without their knowledge.
When consumers were able to determine they were being charged for services they hadn’t ordered, the complaint alleges that T-Mobile in many cases failed to provide consumers with full refunds. Indeed, the FTC charged that T-Mobile refused refunds to some customers, offering only partial refunds of two months’ worth of the charges to others, and in other cases instructed consumers to seek refunds directly from the scammers — without providing accurate contact information to do so.
The complaint also notes that in some cases, T-Mobile claimed that consumers had authorised the charges despite having no proof of consumers doing so.
The FTC’s complaint seeks a court order to permanently prevent T-Mobile from engaging in mobile cramming and to obtain refunds for consumers and disgorgement of T-Mobile’s ill-gotten gains.
The FTC thanks the Federal Communications Commission and its Enforcement Bureau for their invaluable assistance with and close cooperation and coordination in this matter.
The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 5-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.
The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.