Flynn firestorm places spotlight on top White House lawyer

Michael Flynn’s resignation Monday from his post as national security adviser to President Donald Trump, which came after just more than three weeks on the job, has placed the spotlight on another White House official: Trump’s top lawyer.

As multiple sources reported Monday, former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and a senior career national security official told Donald McGahn, White House counsel, in late January about strong concerns related to Flynn’s communication with a Russian ambassador.

Yates said she believed Flynn misled senior administration officials about his December phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, during which Flynn reportedly urged Kislyak to not overreact to the latest round of sanctions instituted by President Barack Obama, who levied them as a result of Russia’s reported interference in the 2016 US election.

The acting attorney general additionally warned that Flynn was perhaps vulnerable to Russian blackmail, multiple sources told The Washington Post.

Flynn had told Vice President Mike Pence that he did not discuss the Obama administration sanctions on Russia with Kislyak. Pence later repeated Flynn’s claim in a Fox News interview.

But as The Post reported, it was not clear what McGahn, who previously served as Trump’s top campaign lawyer, did with the information Yates and another official provided him.

If McGahn did not tell the president about the message, it would be incompetence. If he did tell Trump of the episode, it begs the question of why Flynn was able to stay on in his post for the weeks that followed.

“It’s unimaginable that the White House general counsel would sit on it [and] not tell anybody else in the White House,” David Gergen, who worked in the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Clinton administrations, said during a Monday interview on CNN.

“In every White House I’ve ever been in, this would go to the president like that,” he added, snapping his fingers.

As Jack Goldsmith wrote in Lawfare Tuesday, the crucial question moving forward will be “what McGahn did with this information, and when, and why.”

And, as Goldsmith presented in his Tuesday post, this is only the latest White House firestorm involving McGahn.

Others included the number of ethical controversies that have surrounded the administration since Trump won the November election, and the botched rollout of Trump’s temporary travel ban from seven Muslim-majority nations.

“There were early indications that McGahn ignored the usual protocols for ethics vetting of Cabinet officials,” he wrote. “Since then the problem has only grown worse and has drawn bipartisan ire. One wants to know what McGahn’s role has been in ensuring (or not ensuring) compliance with relevant ethics rules, and (as several Democrat Senators asked last week) what ‘clear and specific steps the White House is taking to prevent further violations of government ethics laws by members of the White House?'”

On the travel ban, Goldsmith wrote that one of McGahn’s responsibilities is coordinating between multiple agencies on legal policies, adding he should have been able to anticipate and correct any problems with the executive order before it was issued.

“And he should have advised the president after his first anti-[US District Judge James] Robart tweet, and after the other more aggressive ones, that the tweets were hurting the president’s legal cause,” he wrote. “If McGahn did not do these things, he is incompetent, and perhaps we can attribute impulsive incompetence to the president. But if McGahn did do these things — if he tried to put the brakes on the EO, and if he warned his client about the adverse impact of his tweets — then he has shockingly little influence with the President and within the White House.”

Additionally, Goldsmith wrote that if a New York Times report about Trump being angry he “was not fully briefed” on the details of an executive order related to the organisation of the National Security Council and its Principals’ Committee was accurate, that too falls on McGahn.

Former Ambassador Norman Eisen, who served as President Barack Obama’s top ethics lawyer during his first term in office, summed up the problems facing McGahn.

“[Two] biggest Trump debacles so far were both in WH Counsel McGahn’s wheelhouse: Muslim ban EO & Yates telling him about Flynn convos,” he tweeted.

And MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough, whose words carry importance to Trump as he is a frequent viewer of the morning program, tweeted that McGahn is basically good as gone following the Flynn debacle.

“All the knives are out for him,” Scarborough wrote. “I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s gone in a week.”

NOW WATCH: Here’s how powerful an executive order is and how it could be reversed

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.