“One man with courage is a majority,” — Thomas Jefferson
My last post was about the disarray in Europe. But what about America?
Let’s start with some interesting statistics. The famous American “fruit” company, Apple, according to the latest financial report, now has more cash to spend than the American government. While in itself is not a critical factor, this still poses a sort of dilemma. Is business so much ahead of the government in America?
In the backdrop of the ongoing debt debate, Barack Obama looks like a man who picked a fight that he is unable to finish. But wait, Obama just announced that Republican and Democratic leaders reached an agreement on raising the U.S. debt limit and avoiding default. The deficit reduction is meant to happen over a period of 10 years. And both sides went to a seemingly lose-lose compromise just to get the deal. Will it hold or even pay off?
The debt-related stand-off in Washington is political in nature, having been initially thrust upon incredulous investors. Increasing America’s overdraft, which, according to Government Accountability Office, has been increased 74 times over the past 50 years, beyond $14.3 trillion should have been relatively simple. But Republican congressmen, furious about big government, have recklessly used it as a political tool to embarrass Obama.
America’s fiscal problem is not now, it should be spending to boost recovery, but in the medium term. Its absurdly convoluted tax system, allegedly changed 579 times only during last year, is very inefficient, and there is speculation that ageing of its baby-boomers will push its big number of entitlement programmes into bankruptcy. Obama set up a commission to examine this issue and until recently completely ignored its sensible conclusions. For long time, Obama also held the illusion that the panacea to the deficit is to tax the rich (top 5% who already pay 60% of taxes).
The problem, in America like in Europe, lies not just in the weak, inconsistent leadership and inability to commit to radical economic measures necessary to cure the ailing economy, but also in the political structures. Just like in Japan, its dysfunctional politics were stemming from its one-party system, in American Congress, the moderate centre has collapsed, in part because partisan redistricting has handed over power to the extremes, ushering it into a radical quasi-one-sided system, not unlike the Japanese.
But American politics is less broken than many think or allege. Since 2009, Congress has passed a huge stimulus bill, ARRA (although there are 1.3 million fewer private-sector workers today than when the ARRA was passed), aimed at economic recovery, evidence that the legislature is still able to get things done.
American economy is becoming increasingly vulnerable. New data continue to reveal just how weak growth was in the second quarter of 2011; The economy has expanded at a 1.3 per cent annual pace. Markets are declining, and businesses are building up cash reserves as insurance against the worst. After two years of pitifully slow recovery, while tens of millions of workers are unemployed, currently at about 14 million, and wages are flat, the government is doing little to get back to economic growth.
Some possible solutions to the ailing American economy include:
- Government size to be reduced (public sector, expenditures) in order to put a dent in this debt.
- Congress to accept cuts on entitlements.
- Government to create a favourable environment for job creation; the private sector does the rest (recently, McKinsey conducted a research asking, “What is the single most important step the U.S. should take to create more jobs” and published the responses here).
- Continue pursuing/following-up with taxes for the top 5% (to be invested, for example, in increasing financial aid for college students).
- Move some (according to certain criteria) of 46% of American population, who pay no Federal income tax, into the ranks of the remaining 54%.
- Impose a national sales/VAT tax. Tax consumption (not investment) and reward savings.
- Let the capitalism (supply and demand) solve the housing problem instead of introducing artificial measures.
- Let the zombie (aka bailed out) banks/firms go, which might result (for some of them at least) in chapter 11/bankruptcy and making them (in majority of cases) downsize and restructure rather than liquidate.
- Wind down American military engagements abroad (two wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, would save up to $150 billion/year in addition to withdrawing, at least partially, 53,000 military personnel from Germany, 36,000 from Japan and thousands more in another 133 countries).
I started by quoting Jefferson and so I shall finish, hoping that Obama and Congress will act before it is too late.
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” — Thomas Jefferson
NOW WATCH: Briefing videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.