Doping Samples From Athletes Will Be Stored For 10 Years To Stop Sports Cheats

The anti-doping laboratory for the London Olympic Games. Oli Scarff/Getty Images

Blood and urine samples taken from athletes to spot signs of doping should be stored for 10 years, according to a consensus statement of international anti-doping bodies including the Department of Integrity of the Australian Football League.

The authors say it will enable technology to catch up with substances which currently evade detection.

The consensus statement of international anti-doping bodies, published in a special issue of the British Journal of
Sports Medicine,
says much wider use should be made of biological profiling which will show up tiny changes made to the individual’s unique genetic blueprint.

Players competing in the FIFA World Cup in Brazil this June will be among the first athletes to be subject to the freeze and store initiative which will offer the opportunity to retrospectively analyse samples over the course of a sporting career and carry out regular biological profiling.

These form part of a comprehensive set of recommendations agreed by 24 international bodies to implement the World Anti-Doping Code 2015 published this week.

They represent a sea-change in thinking about how to crack down on the increasingly sophisticated techniques used by some athletes to attempt to cheat their way to victory.

The consensus signatories, including representatives from FIFA, the International Olympic Committee, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), and accredited anti-doping laboratories, met in late November last year at FIFA’s headquarters in Switzerland to hear the latest scientific and medical evidence on doping and agree priorities for action.

Professor Jiri Dvorak, FIFA Chief Medical Officer, says the meeting was prompted by the realisation that scientific advances in performance enhancing substances and the ingenuity of sports cheats were outpacing current anti-doping strategies.

“The fight against doping has intensified over the past 10 to 15 years, but the increase in simple sampling procedures has not stopped some athletes from continuing [to cheat],” he says.

Greater emphasis needs to be given to deterrents and prevention; the regular gathering of forensic intelligence; and collaboration between all the interested parties in sport, medicine, and science, he says.

“The deterrent effect of delayed testing with newly devised analytical methods is substantial,” says the Consensus Statement, which suggests that in future it should be possible to detect the way in which doping can leave a “molecular signature” on individual cells.

FIFA started the biological passport initiative, explains Professor Dvorak in the accompanying podcast, but it needs to be more widely applied. It won’t be cheap to begin with, he admits, but it will be much more effective over the long term.

Other approaches agreed include tailoring the assessment of doping risk to the demands of the individual sport. For example, cyclists or cross country skiers are likely to choose different substances and methods to illicitly boost their performance than those preferred by weight-lifters or wrestlers, says the Statement.

Testing programs also need to take account of the training periods of individual sports, and the degree to which doping has become a normal part of the culture. This type of “intelligent testing” will yield more results than quantity, says the Statement.

NOW WATCH: Briefing videos

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.