- A Pennsylvania police officer will not be charged for shooting a suspect in the stomach, because the officer apparently believed he was deploying his Taser instead of firing his gun.
- The Buck County District Attorney said in a statement that the shooting “was neither justified, nor criminal, but was excused.”
- Visit INSIDER.com for more stories.
A Pennsylvania prosecutor said he decided not to charge a police officer for shooting a suspect in the stomach – because the officer believed he had been deploying his Taser instead of firing his gun.
Buck County District Attorney Matthew Weintrub said in a statement that the shooting “was neither justified, nor criminal, but was excused.”
The officer, who has not been identified, had violated department policies by wearing his Taser on his right side during the shooting, just in front of his firearm.
“This violation of policy, however, does not constitute a violation of law,” the district attorney’s office said in a statement.
“This was an honest mistake, with an unfortunate consequence,” Weintraub told the local ABC affiliate WPVI.
Read more: A woman in Cleveland was jailed over an unpaid traffic ticket. Corrections officers have been charged with strapping her to a chair for hours, punching her, and emptying half a can of pepper spray into her face.
The March 3 incident occurred after officers struggled with the suspect, Brian Riling, in a holding cell over a bag of drugs.
Footage of the incident shows that the officer yells “Taser!” while reaching towards his right side, withdrawing his gun and shooting Riling in the stomach.
The district attorney’s office said Riling was treated by other officers, rushed to hospital, and was held in critical condition for several days. He has since been released.
The office said that the officer would have been justified in using his Taser to regain control of Riling, since he had reasonable fear that the struggle could put his fellow officer in danger. The office added that using a gun should have been the “last resort.”
“Because the officer believed he was deploying his Taser and not wielding his service firearm, he did not possess the criminal mental state required to be guilty of a crime under state law,” the statement said.
- Read more:
- Authorities arrested a suspect in the fires at 3 historically black Louisiana churches – and it’s the son of a sheriff’s deputy
- Louisville police officers stopped, frisked, and handcuffed a teen driver for making a ‘wide turn,’ then criticised his attitude
- A Florida sheriff’s office tweeted adorable pictures of its new K-9 puppy Rommel, then changed its name to Scout after realising ‘the name is also tied to a #nazi war criminal’
- The California cliff crash that killed a couple and their 6 adopted kids was a murder-suicide, a jury ruled
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.