- US federal government has directly spent $US350 billion since 2007 due to climate change, according to the Government Accountability Office.
- These costs will rise exponentially with time, potentially hitting more than $US100 billion yearly by the end of the century.
A US government watchdog has published a new tally for the cost of climate change in recent years that includes eye-popping estimates for the future: climate-linked disruptions could cost the United States $US35 billion per year by 2050.
As the country reels from the devastation wrought by hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria, the report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds the federal government has “incurred direct costs of more than $US350 billion because of extreme weather and fire events.”
That includes $US205 billion for domestic disaster response and relief, $US90 billion for crop and flood insurance, $US34 billion for wildland fire management and $US28 billion for maintenance and repairs to federal facilities and federally-managed areas, the report says.
The report notes the effects and costs of extreme events “will increase in significance as what are considered rare events become more common and intense because of climate change.”
By 2050, the yearly cost of climate change to the federal government could rise by $US12 billion to $US35 billion per year, the report says, and that range would surge to $US34 billion to $US100 billion by the end of the century.
The GAO provides the following chart as a warning of the types of events the country could be grappling with by the year 2100:
So how is the federal government to respond? The GAO makes the rather meek recommendation that “the appropriate entities within the Executive Office of the President, including the Council on Environmental Quality, Office and Management and Budget, and Office of Science and Technology Policy, use information on the potential economic effects of climate change to help identify significant climate risks facing the federal government and craft appropriate federal responses.”
It adds that “such responses could include establishing a strategy to identify, prioritise, and guide federal investments to enhance resilience against future disasters.”