- The CEO of health insurer Cigna, David Cordani, says the problem with America’s healthcare system is that most of the money is being spent on intervention after people already are sick. Cordani believes we need to spend more money and resources keeping people healthy in the first place.
- Cordani says that it makes sense for Americans to get health insurance through their jobs. He argues that employers have a vested interest in keeping employees healthy.
- Cordani is disappointed that America let the opioid crisis get to where it is today. He believes the solution to that problem, and many other problems in healthcare, will rely on more personalisation.
David Cordani is the CEO of health insurance company Cigna.Cigna is acquiring Express Scripts, the largest standalone pharmacy benefit manager, in a $US67 billion deal that includes $US15 billion of debt. Cordani sat down with Business Insider’s Sara Silverstein to talk about the merger, the future of healthcare, and his new book “The Courage To Go Forward.” Following is a transcript of the video.
Sara Silverstein: So first tell me what the plan is with Express Scripts, why merge with them?
David Cordani:Sure, sowe’re a global health service company we’re fortunate, we have 95 million customer relationships around the world. As we look at all of our business includinginthe United States, we see that still the number one need for Americans is to improve affordability and to do so in a very personalised fashion. Pharmaceutical services have quickly grown to about 25% of the overall cost equation, with specialty pharmacy being abouttwo-thirdsof that 25% and about half of that is in the medical part of thepromise. So,itpresents an opportunity to further improve affordability. Also, further improve quality because in America when there’s a gap in healthcare, so evidence based care is not followed,it typically ties to a pharmaceutical. So that’s point one. Point two is it expands our distribution reach. There’s a lot of ways in which Express Scripts distributes to employers,healthplans,or governmental agencies that we don’t. So it expands our distribution reach to touch more lives with our behavioural services, ourwell-beingservices. So, improve affordability and personalisation for our clients and customers, improve quality, and then expand reach, or touch more lives.
Silverstein: And how are yougoing toincrease affordability?
Cordani:Yeah, so first you always need to have a strong foundation. Cigna’s delivered the lowest or the best medical cost trend in the industry five years running. And 2018 will be six years running. And we do so by engaging the individuals, trying to lower health risks, keep people healthy,and then improve the quality of healthcare that’s delivered. Express Scripts has also delivered differentiated medical cost trends. So we’re building off of strength. But the way we further build off that strength is further tighten and strengthen the relationship between an individual or patient with their physician-we do that quite well through our”Collaborative Accountable Care”relationships. Two, use actionable information to predict or identify health risks before they happen,So, aprediabeticbefore they become diabetic, a coronary risk patient before they have the heart attack, a high-risk maternity mum, and help that mum go full-term, that’s how you improve overall cost and quality,and the combined capabilities,as well as information,enable us to do that even better.
Silverstein: And what do you think will change about the way that healthcare looks in the future?
Cordani:I think the biggest change we aspire for and as a company we’re driving toward, is more personalisation. So what do I mean by that? Typically in the United States, most healthcare is purchased, the programs are purchased, insurance and related services, through some intermediary, an employer, a governmental agency. And they do good jobs to try to get the right package for the benefit of individuals, but nobody’s average, we’re all very unique. So, through information, and through technological innovation, you get a lot more personalisation to the coverage, to the modalities of communication, to the access profile that works best for an individual so I think you’ll see a lot more personalisation of engagement from that standpoint. And secondly,for the medical professionals, doctors, as well as the manufacturers of devices,and pharmaceuticals, the rewards need to be much more oriented around the outcomes and the quality than the consumption. So those are the two big changes we see and we’re fuelling and driving as a corporation.
Silverstein: And do you think it makes sense at all for healthcare to be tied to employers anymore given how much our workforce has changed?
Cordani:Yeah so in the United States greater than 50% of Americans today get their health services support through an employer. That, that is a manifestation from a long time ago post World War II wage controls that existed, but, but we are where we are. Answer to your question is yes, I do. And the reason whyis:an employer actually has a vested interest in helping to keep their employees healthy,and productive,and present from a work standpoint. Two, the worksite and the culture of an employer create some mechanisms to engage an individual, ways to communicate, ways to provide on-site care, ways to provide peer support, program support, etc. So there’s incentive alignment, there’s culture you could pull against and support it,and then there’s delivery mechanism. So we think the answer is yes, and we have a ton of bright spots where we could point to employers that have innovated with us and we’ve innovated with them. And their employees and therefore their business is better off and those employees family members are better off ’cause they’re getting better, more comprehensive healthcare.
Silverstein: And what do you think makes America different? Why are we spending so much on healthcare? Can you point to one thing that like our policies,or something in America that is a problem?
Cordani:Yeah, so our system is quite different, right? We’re a global company, we do business all over the world. So we’re able to see systems in the most developed OECD countries and developing countries around the world. There’s multiple differences. First and foremost,the United States is the largest sick care interventionist system in the world. We spend the majority of our money and resources addressing people once they’re sick. We need to spend some more of our resources keeping people healthy in the first case, and identifying people who are at risk of health events and lowering those health risks. Some other countries do that better through social service support, poor community based health support, etc. Secondly, we have more specialists and more hospitals per capita than any other OECD countries and less primary care, be it OBGYN, pediatrician, family practitioners, and, and we need to moderate that a little bit, to, again, help coordinate the whole person on the front end. There’s trade-offs in the way we’ve built our system. As a company we’ve had great success partnering with physicians through what we call,”Collaborative Accountable Care”relationships, we have 375 of which that are up and running with physicians,and another 125 with hospitals, and we’re working more comprehensively. But in a nutshell, we wait too long in terms of trying to fix somebody once they’re sick, as opposed to engage on the front-end and keep people healthy in the first place, that’s where Cignaexpendsa lot of resources. Secondly, we spend a lot more money on the high cost intervention, as opposed to enabling the primary care physician, the geriatrician, the pediatrician, to have more resources to help to coordinate care for individuals. And we have a different pricing scheme relative to some of our services, be they pharmaceutical or otherwise,versusother parts of the world.
Silverstein: And when you look at theopioidcrisis, what do you think is something-what will help that? What do we need to do?
Cordani:In a way theopioidcrisis is first, it’s something our country should be quite disappointed we allowed to transpire, because essentially we’ve systematically poisoned our population in a way in-terms of the mass consumption ofopioids. But if you step back, it’s another example that reinforces we try to answer problems with interventions. So, have a problem, have an intervention. As opposed to more comprehensively helping individuals manage pain. So stepping back, we consume the vast majority of the worlds pharmaceutical opioids for 5% of the world’s population. That doesn’t really make sense. As a company we stepped forward about two and a half years ago and said we’regoing toreduce the consumption of pharmaceutical opioids by 25% for our customers workinghand in glove with physicians to bring the consumption back to pre-epidemic levels. And we sought to do that in three years. I’m proud our company did it in 22 months. And now we step forward andsaidin cities around the United States, we’re stepping forward with a pledge to reduce the rate of opioid and overdose related deaths by 25%. And the way you do that is one person at a time, and working hand in glove with medical professionals and community leaders. So, to me it’s a problem that is really symptomatic of anoverconsumptionof health services unnecessarily and not addressing the whole person in coordination with the physician and the bright spot is when you work collaboratively with the physician and the individual you could move the needle forward, and I’m proud of what our company did.
Silverstein: And how do you do that on such a large scale,because like you said it is a veryone-to-onething and how do you create an incentiveto not -to reduce the number of prescriptions without hurting people?
Cordani:Yeah,I know, really important and powerful question. So, when you’re a large corporation,no matter what industry you’re in,the risk is that you kind of come at things in a homogeneous way. We believe everything is local. All healthcare is personal, all healthcare is local. So we operate a very localised model, aided by global resources. So the engagement happens with the local practicing physician,with our physician leaders talking hand and glove with those individuals. It comes with convening community leaders, faithbasedleaders, employers, elected officials, locally. Because the solution in Community A is different than the solution in Community B based on the local orientation. And in fact, our strategy is:”go deeper, go local, go beyond.”So we’re quite serious about that localisation in terms of the personalisation, the engagement at the local level, and trying to drive it. But it’s with the clinicians, not to the clinicians. And it’s with the consumer or patient not to the consumer or patient.
Silverstein: And going back to Express Scripts when you look at a merger and when you look beyond just the synergies and the business opportunities, what else are you looking for? What culture or management things are you concerned about?
Cordani:Yeah,I thinkwhichculture is quite important because, again, we’re a globalhealthservice company we’re not an insurance company. We exist to improve the health, well-being,and sense of security of the people we serve. We’re a service based company. So you start with a notion of purpose. What is your purpose? We’re a publicly traded company, and we get that. We’re a performance oriented company,we get that. But you could also be mission based. So looking at a culture that is market oriented, commercially oriented, consumer oriented, respect and understand the clinical community, and want to work with others,and partner with others. Second, a deep empathy and humanity. So, I was with the Express Scripts team on Monday of this week, all day inSaintLouis, meeting with colleaguestalking about- andthere’s a deep passion of community based orientation. When you have those ingredients and an open mindedness relative to sustained innovation, success is possible. If you’re not commercially oriented, if you’re not consumer oriented, if you don’t deeply respect the clinical community, if you’re not community oriented, if you don’t have the empathy and humanity in your,in yourcoworkers-we have 47,000 colleagues,they have 27,000 colleagues, it’s tough to be a service company. So that fibre is quite important and both companies share that fibre.
Silverstein:Great, and you have a new book,“The Courage To Go Forward,”can you tell me what inspired that?
Cordani:Yeah it’s my only book, it’s not the new book so it’s the only one Iever penned. And I was fortunate tocoauthorit with the founder of Achilles International. Achilles International is anot-for-profitthat focuses resources on helping people, largely with disabilities,bothphysical and otherwise,set goals, pursue those goals have support around them, and complete those goals. We’ve partnered with them for about a decade. I’ve personally been highly active with them for eight of those 10 years, and there are some really powerful stories that we wanted to tell, their founder and myself, in the book around these profilesincourage of individuals overcoming phenomenal obstacles, to set goals that many people would think are impossible and then introduce a little recipe of how you pursue those goals, because you just don’t will them to happen. And then we introduce this theme of micro communities, how very small aggregations of individuals one,two,or three could wrap around and support an individual in pursuit of that goal. So we wanted to tell the stories, because there’s many stories in there, we wanted to introduce the recipe,andwith an objective of helping people have the courage to set goals that they may think are out of their reach, and help individuals realise that you can change people’s lives one at a time by activating in these microcommunities and lastly the purpose was quite noble because 100% of the proceeds go to benefit Achilles International and further that mission.
Silverstein: And can you tell me what a microcommunity is?
Cordani:So, a microcommunityit’s a term we made up, right? So what it means to me is, I’ll give you a concrete example. Double amputee wounded veteran, sets a goalto – of running their first ever marathon on prosthetics. Never ran a marathon before they had prosthetics. Not a goal that’s seems achievable. One or two people wrap around that individual, and do everything humanly possible to enable that goal to be achieved, they’re gonna pull from other resources but, the intimacy of those one or two people and I’ve had the blessing and fortune of being that one or two persons many times, and seeing the power of that, and failure is not an option, and we’re going to achieve that goal and then the leverage effect afterwardforthat person who realises that goal was achieved to set other goals in their lives. One of the- one of thegentlemen, the first person I ever guided,Matias,he set a goal to actually become a police officer. He was a double amputee. Well he had to accomplish all of the able-body tests, which were largely deemed to be impossible, failed multiple times along the journey, today he’s a Long Island Police officer. Sothat’s -those are the powerful messages you want to get through. But the microcommunities are essentially to instill the ability for one or two individuals to make huge change, and then the leverage effect of that.
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.