- Half of the world’s iPhones are made at a sprawling factory complex in Zhengzhou, China that employs as many as 350,000 people and has spawned a mini city residents call “iPhone City.”
- Thousands of residents’ livelihoods rely on the success of Apple and Foxconn, though they don’t even work at the companies.
- We spent the day with a 31-year-old woman whose entire life has been shaped by Foxconn and Apple, having worked at the Foxconn’s Shenzhen factory in her 20s and then moved to Zhengzhou to open her own business catering to factory workers.
- She told us that the lives of ex-factory workers like herself, who open businesses when they save enough money, is often harder than that of the factory workers. Her life is better now than when she was growing up, but she sees little opportunity to escape the grinding lifestyle she currently lives.
Liu Fei, a 31-year-old Chinese woman, lives just outside the gates of the biggest iPhone factory in the world, the Foxconn Zhengzhou Science Park.
Liu’s livelihood depends on the factory’s prosperity – and, in effect, Apple’s – despite the fact that neither the factory nor Apple will ever pay her a cent.
The factory, run by the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer Foxconn, employs about 350,000 people during the busy summer months before the fall release of a new iPhone. At its peak, the factory produces 500,000 phones a day or up to 350 a minute – about half of the world’s iPhones. More often, it has a workforce of about half that, or less.
Though the factory is nominally located in Zhengzhou, a city of 9.5 million people, the factory is actually more than 20 miles outside downtown, separated by freeways, suburbs, and dirt scrublands.In the years since the factory opened, an entire city has sprouted up to serve Foxconn’s workforce.
A decade ago, the area had only dirt and fields of corn and wheat. In 2010, the government bought out local farmers, and the factory was up and running within the year.
Much of this newly sprouted city, which residents and factory workers have dubbed “iPhone City,” sits in the alleyways below the 10 or 12-story dormitory buildings, where workers live eight to a room.
Below, a migrating workforce of entrepreneurs and vendors has set up shop below to make a living cooking street food, offering massages, or selling socks or other knicknacks.
Most of the vendors in iPhone City, Liu said, are former factory workers like herself. Liu is one of the luckiest. She has a large restaurant in a makeshift district just outside the factory’s gate. It’s relatively clean and spacious. It could probably serve 40 or 50 people during breakfast or dinner, when day shift and night shift workers converge before or after their shift.
“We don’t make special food here. We just make whatever is cheap and will fill the workers up,” Liu, whose name has been changed to protect her identity and business, told Business Insider on a recent afternoon that we spent in the city.
Liu’s entire life has been shaped by an American company whose products she will likely never own. Here’s how:
Liu was 18 years old when she and her husband decided to leave their hometown to work at Foxconn’s then-flagship factory complex in Shenzhen.
Liu was 18 years old when she and her husband decided to leave their lao jia, or hometown.
Liu is from a small village called Qian Hou in Henan, long one of China’s most impoverished provinces.
In 2008, The New York Times described the province as one untouched by China’s boom, where people are too poor to heat their homes in winter or have running water, and mobile phones are an “impossible luxury.”
Three years earlier, the two moved to Shenzhen, the electronics manufacturing capital of the world, and got jobs at Foxconn’s flagship factory in the Longhua Science and Technology Park, a 15-factory complex employing hundreds of thousands of workers amidst a campus that was its own mini-city.
Apple and Foxconn’s fortunes and prosperity have become increasingly intertwined since 2005, when Liu started working at Foxconn’s Shenzhen factory.
In 2005, Foxconn was growing into its status as the world’s largest contract electronics manufacturer. The company had contracts with major electronics companies like Dell, Sony, and, most importantly, Apple.
At the time, Apple’s best selling product was the iPod.
The couple worked at the Longhua factory for five years. Over that time, Foxconn and Apple’s relationship deepened and so too did the companies’ fortunes become intertwined. In 2005, Foxconn’s revenue totaled $US21.54 billion. In 2007, the year Apple introduced the iPhone, the company’s revenue jumped to $US38.11 billion. In 2010, it nearly doubled to $US79.38 billion.
Foxconn’s reliance on Apple has increased with revenue growth. In 2009, Apple products accounted for around 25% of Foxconn’s revenue. By 2012, it was up to 60%. It has hovered between 50-60% in the years since and, while revenue grew to $US110.79 billion in 2012, it has hovered between $US130-$US140 billion in the years since.
Foxconn has faced accusations of labour abuses, poor working conditions, and harsh penalties for workers who make mistakes throughout its recent history. Investigations of working conditions at Foxconn during Liu’s time (2005-2010) found workers to be both underpaid and overworked.
TheCentre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) reported in 2005 that the average worker works 27 days per month for 10-11 hours per day and earns 1000 RMB ($US157) per month, including overtime.In 2008, SOMO found that workers had to work compulsory overtime leading to 70-hour work weeks on average.
There was a wave of suicides among Foxconn workers in 2010 and 2011, prompting Apple and Foxconn to make changes at the factories.
When Foxconn opened its massive factory complex in Zhengzhou, it started a massive migration of Henanese returning to their home province. Liu was one of them.
When most people think about the economic impact of a large company, it usually stops at the jobs at the factory or the office park and the tax revenue. But Foxconn’s immense labour needs have the ability to shift an entire population to a new place.
As Liu Miao, the head of a private recruiting center in Zhengzhou, told The Times in 2016 of Foxconn’s labour needs, “Every city’s department of labour and ministry of human resources is involved” in sourcing workers from the province.
In the case of the Foxconn Zhengzhou Science Park, it had the effect of bringing home a migratory workforce.
In 2010, Liuand her husband decided to leave the Longhua factory when they heard that Foxconn was setting up a factory complex, even bigger than the one they worked at, on the outskirts of Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan.
They packed up their life and headed home. As happens whenever Foxconn or another manufacturer opens up a factory in China, hundreds of thousands migrated for the work. Many, like Liu and her husband, were Henanese returning home.
One night in iPhone City, we had dinner with a table of Foxconn workers eating and drinking beer at an outdoor restaurant. All four – whose ages ranged from 22 to 40 – were Henanese who returned to the province after working in factories in other parts of the country.
They emphasised that, in a workforce ranging from 120,000 to 350,000, there is bound to be diversity, but most of their coworkers were Henanese who moved to Zhengzhou to be closer to home.
“People like to work at this factory because you are close to your family if you are from Henan,” Liu said. “You get Sundays off and you can go home and visit your family. That’s the perk.”
Many people who work at factories farther from their hometown see their families only twice a year, on Chinese New Year’s and National Day.
Like thousands of those that migrated, Liu had no intention of working at the factory. She had an idea for a better life, though years later, it still eludes her.
What makes Liu unique is that, though she was migrating home, and she had no intentions of working at the factory.
Liu and her husband decided to use their savings to open up a restaurant for hungry factory workers who would inevitably be looking for better food than Foxconn’s cafeteria could offer. Liu knew that the food at the factory would be bad; she’d spent years eating at the one in Longhua.
“The noodles are barely cooked,” she said with a laugh.
Liu and her husband saw the new factory as a way out of the factory lifestyle while living closer to her lao jia – about a one-hour drive from Zhengzhou – where her son was being raised by her parents.
Liu has found that, for her family, there is no way out of the grinding poverty that has marked her life both as a factory worker and a restaurant owner.
A better life has receded before their eyes.
For all of the legitimate criticism of Foxconn’s labour practices,Foxconn workers we spoke to said time and again that the factory was neither better nor worse than the dozens of other factories in China where they had worked.
Liu was unequivocal that the lives of the vendors and restaurant owners – most of whom are ex-factory workers – are harder than those at the factory.
Vendors open their restaurants early in the morning to cook breakfast for the day-shift workers and stay open through lunch. After lunch, they clean up and sleep for a few hours. They reopen around 7 p.m. for dinner and the night-shift workers and stay open until the night workers’ lunch at 1 a.m., then go to sleep around 3 a.m., after cleaning the restaurant. Most nights, Liu and her husband sleep only three or four hours.
Liu understands the appeal of working at Foxconn, where, she says, the pay is higher. Foxconn has raised its wages to 1,900 yuan ($US300) a month, and workers can raise their monthly salaries to about $US676 depending on how much overtime they work or how long they stay at the company.
There’s less pressure, too, Liu said. Factory work may be boring and repetitive, she said. But you don’t have to worry.
“There’s more pressure running your own business,” she said. “I have to think about what I’m missing. I have to worry if business isn’t good.”
Liu’s livelihood, like that of all iPhone City residents, is subject to the choices of Foxconn and the local government. Entire livelihoods could disappear without warning.
Liu worries a lot about business.
This year, the factory seems quieter than usual, she said. Half of the businesses in the makeshift village are closed, as the district where she and 20-30 other vendors and restaurants serve workers is scheduled to be demolished by the end of the year.
No one is positive what will replace the village, but Liu has heard rumours that the government wants to turn the scrublands around the factory into gardens. A new airport is situated next to the factory. No one wants to look at a shantytown and dirt when they fly in, she said.
The threat of demolition has scared most vendors and restaurant owners out of the makeshift restaurant district. Many were afraid they would pay their landlord rent for the year and be unable to get it back when the trucks arrive, Liu said.
But even with less competition, Liu and her husband are making a fraction of what they did in 2014, 2015, and 2016. Liu estimated that at the time of the year we visited, early May, the factory usually has 120,000 employees. This year, she said, it seems like half of that.
Liu’s anecdotal evidence is hardly fact, but perhaps reports that iPhones sales are experiencing a sharp decline point to the idea that less iPhones need to be manufactured this year.
By way of evidence, Liu motioned to trays of premade food behind a deli counter. Two years ago, she said, all that food would be sold in the half-hour after opening in the morning, even during the slow months.
We were there around 2 p.m., after lunch, and the trays were still more than half full. Liu used to be so busy that she had to have six full-time employees. Now she is down to two.
If Foxconn or Apple’s fortunes turn — or the promise of automated iPhone factories comes to fruition, as looks to increasingly be the case — it won’t be just the factory workers who lose their livelihood.
As Liu told me about the impending demolition and the way her business swayed with the rhythms of the factory, we were reminded of a passage from a recent piece by New Yorker’s Jiayang Fang about centralised efforts to transform the economy of apoverty-stricken coal regionin northwestern China into a world-renowned wine industry.
While visiting a vineyard, Fang speaks to a farmworker who, when asked how her life was, repeated apeasant phrase common to the region, “kao tian chi fan – to rely on the sky for food.” When one is farming, life is made good or bad by the rain; you have little control over it.
By the end of the piece, Fang likens this attitude to China’s modern era, but the government has become the sky:
“The government’s schemes, centrally planned and then implemented in province after province, can make fortunes, ruin lives, or leave social hierarchies much the same as they were before … The sky could ripen your vines or ruin your crops and there was nothing you could do about it. Here the government was no different: a distant power inscrutable to those on the ground.”
Liu seemed to view Foxconn and the local government in this way as well. When I asked what she would dowhen the bulldozers came, she smiled as though we had asked about the weather.
“I guess we’ll move somewhere else, set up our restaurant, and do the same thing,” Liu said.
Other business owners in iPhone City had a similar “what can we do” shrug to Foxconn. Ma, a 25-year-old masseuse from Zhengzhou and a former factory worker, told Business Insider that all of the businesses nearby were losing money at the time. Everyone was just trying to hold on until the usual swell of workers in June.
“They can’t afford the rent right now,” she said.
The ones that can’t hold out will close up shop, and some other hopeful will try their hand at the game.
And, if the fortunes of Foxconn or Apple turn – or the companies turn to automation, as looks to be increasingly the case – all that will be left to do is look to the sky.
NOW WATCH: Executive Life videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.