- Two universities have stripped Charlie Rose of journalism awards after the recent allegations of sexual harassment leveled against him by several women.
- The “unprecedented” move was made with the “utmost seriousness and deliberation,” an official at Arizona State University’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism said.
- The nullification follows a series of accusations from women who allege Rose engaged in lewd and inappropriate behaviour spanning several years.
Two university journalism programs on Friday stripped renowned journalist and former TV host Charlie Rose of awards following the numerous sexual harassment allegations against Rose that have emerged in recent days.
His Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Journalism award was rescinded by Arizona State University on Friday. A second award from the William Allen White Foundation at the University of Kansas was also recalled.
“This unprecedented action is taken with the utmost seriousness and deliberation,” said a statement from Christopher Callahan, Dean of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University. “The idea of ‘taking back’ a Cronkite Award is so foreign that the possibility was never even considered when the award was first created.”
“We give the award each year based on the knowledge we have of a recipient at that time,” Callahan’s statement continued. “When new information about a recipient surfaces, the question we ask is not whether the award would be given again with a new set of facts, but whether the transgressions are so egregious that they demand nothing less than a reversal of history.”
Rose received the award in 2015, after a career that spanned several decades. He held what was widely viewed as an untarnished reputation in the industry until eight women who previously worked, or were interviewed by, Rose alleged he had engaged in lewd and inappropriate behaviour.
Following the damaging allegations, Rose was fired by CBS News and PBS.
“I am greatly embarrassed,” a statement from Rose said Monday. “I have behaved insensitively at times, and I accept responsibility for that. I always felt that I was pursuing shared feelings, even though I now realise I was mistaken.”
The annual award is given to a “leading figure in journalism.” Recipients include distinguished journalists, such as PBS NewsHour co-anchors and managing editors Judy Woodruff and Gwen Ifill, who died last year; NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw; and World News anchor Diane Sawyer.
Read the full statement from the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism Dean Christopher Callahan here:
“The Cronkite School is rescinding the Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Journalism given to Charlie Rose in 2015.
This unprecedented action is taken with the utmost seriousness and deliberation. We are not in the business of trying to rewrite history. The Cronkite Award is bestowed each year to celebrate a great journalist, our school, our students, our alumni and our profession. It is a lifetime achievement award. It does not come with term limits. It is given in perpetuity. The idea of “taking back” a Cronkite Award is so foreign that the possibility was never even considered when the award was first created by Walter, the school and the Cronkite Endowment Board of Trustees more than 30 years ago.
We give the award each year based on the knowledge we have of a recipient at that time. When new information about a recipient surfaces, the question we ask is not whether the award would be given again with a new set of facts, but whether the transgressions are so egregious that they demand nothing less than a reversal of history.
I believe Mr. Rose’s actions of sexual misconduct reported by The Washington Post and other media outlets, which are largely unrefuted, rise to that level. The damage caused by Mr. Rose’s actions extends far beyond the news organisations for which he worked. The actions victimized young women much like those who make up the overwhelming majority of Cronkite students – young women who deserve to enter workplaces that reward them for their hard work, intelligence and creativity and where they do not have to fear for their safety or dignity. In rescinding this award, we hope to send an unequivocal message that what Mr. Rose did is unacceptable, and that such behaviour – far too common in not just media companies but many organisations – must stop.
We also understand that this action is largely symbolic: The fact is this award was given to Mr. Rose in 2015. But we think the message is important – to our current students, past students, future students, and all of journalism. And that is why we are taking this unprecedented action today.
This decision was reached with input from scores of Cronkite School stakeholders: students, alumni, faculty, staff, news industry leaders and the Cronkite Endowment Board of Trustees. In conversations with dozens of these individuals, the overwhelming view was that the 2015 award should be rescinded. Conversations with students and young alumni were particularly powerful. I also convened a special ad hoc committee representing senior faculty, school leaders, the Endowment Board, alumni and students. The committee members’ advice, overwhelmingly, was to rescind the award. And today, after a thorough conversation, the Cronkite Endowment Board of Trustees voted unanimously to recommend rescinding the award.
All of these thoughtful and thorough discussions were tremendously helpful in the decision-making process, as well as an uplifting reminder of the integrity, passion and leadership within our school community – from students and faculty to supporters, alumni and the Board of Trustees. But please know that while many voices were heard in discussions throughout week, this is a decision by the dean, and therefore any criticism of the decision, or the decision-making process, should be directed exclusively toward me.”
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.