Join

Enter Details

Comment on stories, receive email newsletters & alerts.

@
This is your permanent identity for Business Insider Australia
Your email must be valid for account activation
Minimum of 8 standard keyboard characters

Subscribe

Email newsletters but will contain a brief summary of our top stories and news alerts.

Forgotten Password

Enter Details


Back to log in

There are 2 ways Trump could have Mueller fired, and one of them led to Nixon's downfall

Robert MuellerAlex Wong/Getty ImagesRobert Mueller.

President Donald Trump’s close friend told PBS on Monday night that the president was “weighing” whether or not to fire Robert Mueller, the special counsel overseeing the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s election interference.

Trump could order Mueller’s dismissal. But he would not be able to fire him directly unless he opted to repeal the special counsel regulations enacted in 1999, according to
Neal Katyal, the former acting solicitor general who helped draft the regulations governing the appointment of a special counsel.

But that would be an “extravagant” move, Katyal said. If Trump wanted Mueller gone, it is more likely he would order Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to fire him.

And even that would be shocking.

“Either of those actions was unthinkable to us back in 1999, for we understood that President Richard Nixon’s attempt in this regard ultimately led to his downfall,” Katyal wrote, referring to the resignations of Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus in October 1973, after they refused to follow President Richard Nixon’s orders and fire the special prosecutor investigating Watergate, Archibald Cox.

“At the same time, after Trump’s firing of FBI Director James B. Comey, many things once thought beyond the realm of possibility look less so now,” Katyal said.

Andrew Wright, a professor of constitutional law at Savannah Law school, said Trump has the power to order Rosenstein to fire Mueller. But he said the special counsel regulations “require termination only ‘for cause,'” meaning Trump would have to convince Rosenstein that there are grounds to dismiss Mueller.

Department of Justice regulations stipulate that the attorney general (or, in this case, Rosenstein) “may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies,” and must “inform the Special Counsel in writing of the specific reason for his or her removal.”

There is no evidence that Mueller has engaged in any inappropriate behaviour that would warrant his removal. He was also already granted a waiver by the Justice Department to lead the probe despite a possible conflict of interest stemming from his law firm’s representation of some of the individuals caught up in the investigation, including former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser.

For Trump to order Mueller’s firing with no good reason, then, “would be insane even by Trump-era standards,” Wright said. And it’s possible that Rosenstein could refuse, meaning he would either have to resign or Trump would have to fire him, creating a situation eerily reminiscent to Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre.

Asha Rangappa, an associate dean at Yale Law School and former special agent in the FBI’s counterintelligence division, said in an interview that Nixon’s firing of his special prosecutor is what “got the ball rolling on his impeachment,” indicating Trump’s constraints are more political than legal at this point.

If Trump ordered Rosenstein to fire Mueller, or tried to do it himself by repealing the special counsel regulations, Congress would then need to exercise its constitutional power to check the president, Rangappa said.

But even if Congress created an independent commission to continue the Trump-Russia probe — as Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff has said he would pursue if Trump fired Mueller — Congress does not have the power to press charges or seek civil penalties. And while Mueller’s dismissal would not necessarily mean the end of the FBI investigation, the DOJ ultimately has the power to not bring charges against someone even if it’s sitting on a mountain of evidence.

“This is why the political Independence of the DOJ is so paramount,” Rangappa said. “The department needs to be able to make the decision to prosecute or not independent of what the president wants.”

Finally, it’s possible that Rosenstein and Trump could work out a deal in which Rosenstein does not fire Mueller but limits the scope and power of his investigation. Katyal wrote that, while Mueller’s investigative authority looks fairly broad as it was outlined by the Justice Department last month, he does not have the “sweeping powers” afforded to someone who is currently in government and has been confirmed by the Senate.

“In 2003, when Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed to investigate leaks that identified former CIA officer Valerie Plame, his appointment letters made clear that he was granted ‘all the authority of the Attorney General,’ which was ‘plenary,'” Katyal said. He added that those powers are unavailable to Mueller and “stand as a reminder” that he “operates as a subordinate to the Justice Department, not as Rosenstein’s equal.”

NOW WATCH: ‘Melania needs to get with the program’: Ian Bremmer explains the biggest takeaways from Trump’s first foreign trip

NOW WATCH: Briefing videos

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.