A monthly check of $US1,000 delivered to every American adult would grow the US economy by roughly $US2.5 trillion over the course of eight years, according to a new study.
Conducted by the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute, the study investigated three strategies for implementing basic income, a form of wealth distribution that involves giving everyone a standard salary just for being alive.
Proponents of basic income claim it would reduce or even eliminate poverty, while sceptics say it could erase people’s motivations to keep working, possibly ruining the economy instead of improving it.
The three basic incomes proposed by the study were $US1,000 paid monthly to every US adult; $US500 paid monthly to every US adult; and $US250 paid monthly to every US child. “For all three designs,” a summary of the report read, “enacting a UBI and paying for it by increasing the federal debt would grow the economy.”
Specifically, the largest of the three — $US12,000 a year doled out to every American adult — would grow the economy by 12.6% to 13.1%, the study found. Eight years from now, after the policy’s effects have started to wane, that would translate to an increase in gross domestic product of $US2.5 trillion, according to data from the Congressional Budget Office.
There were some assumptions the researchers made in the study that could lead to such an optimistic conclusion.
The team’s analysis was based on people continuing to work as if they weren’t receiving a basic income, something sceptics have taken issue with. Some believe that basic income, while not enough to live off, would disincentivize full-time work.
Some studies have found this not to be the case, but most have taken place in developing countries and have prompted sceptics to argue the results wouldn’t necessarily translate to a richer, more populous country like the United States. At least in the few basic income experiments ongoing in the US, employment rates haven’t seemed to change much.
The researchers also assumed basic income would solve a demand problem in the economy, or the lack of people spending their money to buy things. “Fundamentally, the larger the size of the UBI, the larger the increase in aggregate demand and thus the larger the resulting economy is,” they wrote.
Other economic theories put less stock in that idea. They argue that other costs — like interest rates on mortgages and credit cards — would rise.
The US is still very far from a comprehensive basic income plan. The biggest experiment in the world is set to begin this fall in Kenya. Operated by GiveDirectly, it involves 6,000 people, some of whom will receive a monthly payment every month for the next 12 years. The total experiment will cost $US30 million.
Smaller experiments have cropped up around the world over the last few years, including in California, Canada, Finland, and the Netherlands. Other nations, such as India and Switzerland, have discussed experiments of their own in the coming years.
Until those experiments begin giving people money and analysing the resulting data, however, economists will be left to speculate as to how transformative a basic income could really be.