- Amazon is reportedly planning to split its second headquarters, HQ2, between two locations: Long Island City in New York and the Crystal City area of Arlington, Virginia, according to The New York Times.
- Some people are speculating whether Amazon will be able to double up on some of the proposed financial incentives if it is split between two headquarters.
- At least one expert says it’s not clear what will happen on that front because the process has largely been conducted in secret.
On Monday The Wall Street Journal reported Amazon was planning to split its second headquarters between two locations rather than picking one city.
People immediately began to speculate whether this news would mean that Amazon would be able to double up on the tax breaks and financial incentives offered by many of the 20 finalists.
Wait, wait, wait. You mean this whole thing was about extracting maximum tax benefits from two sites? Huh. https://t.co/pIZypwWlYc
— Jon McHenry (@jonmchenry) November 5, 2018
BREAKING: Amazon Figuring Out Ways To Fleece Two Cities For Tax Benefits And Other Bend-Over-Backward-Ness https://t.co/tasl1oAk46
— drew olanoff (@yoda) November 5, 2018
one of the world’s richest companies getting not one but two cities to give it massive tax breaks is the ultimate grift of 2018, the year of the scam https://t.co/n3ff0pI1Ar
— David Mack (@davidmackau) November 5, 2018
Later on Monday, The New York Times reported that HQ2 would be split between Long Island City, a neighbourhood in Queens, New York, and the Crystal City area of Arlington, Virginia.
Neither location has officially disclosed which financial incentives they would offer Amazon, if any. New York is rumoured only to be offering incentives that could include hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies.
It means there’s no way of knowing whether Amazon would benefit from being in two cities from a tax perspective.
“Unfortunately, because this process has been done almost entirely in secret, we have no way of knowing,” Michael D. Farren, a research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, told Business Insider.
Only four of the 20 finalists including cities Newark, New Jersey; and Columbus, Ohio; have actually announced what economic incentives they would offer. The remaining have stayed mum.
But even for those that have been more transparent, it’s not clear whether the terms would be the same if Amazon does split its new headquarters across two cities. An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment.
If the subsidies are awarded based upon incremental investment in the area, such as the number of jobs or amount of spending on new capital assets, Amazon might not be able to double dip, Farren said.
“We don’t know the structure of how the subsidy is going to be provided,” he said.
Farren said that it was unlikely that Amazon’s decision would be determined by tax breaks anyway.
“What is driving Amazon’s decision is the business-related factors that affected their underlying productivity and profitability – and the No. 1 piece of that is a skilled workforce,” he said. “These things matter much more to Amazon’s earnings than those short-term subsidies.”
“If all you have is flour, then no amount of icing is going to save the cake.”
Read more about Amazon’s HQ2:
- Amazon made an important investment in Seattle, and it highlights a key issue for HQ2
- Amazon HQ2 candidates are going to great lengths to keep their plans secret
- HQ2 is making cities consider projects they have been ignoring for years – and it shows the power of Amazon
- 7 horrible things that could happen to cities if they win Amazon’s HQ2 bid
- The cities where homeowners will benefit the most if Amazon’s 2nd headquarters lands there