- The SEC is supporting an examination of the maker taker stock trading model, where certain stock exchanges compensate market makers and other trading firms for executing stock orders on their venues.
- NYSE, Nasdaq, and Cboe are in favour of the model, while IEX, America’s newest stock exchange, is against it.
- A new-pilot program approved by the agency on Wednesday will test the efficacy of the maker taker model.
The Securities and Exchange Commission agreed to move forward a pilot program that would examine a controversial Wall Street practice.
The agency on Wednesday approved the so-called access fee pilot program, which aims to address criticisms of the maker taker stock trading model.
Some stock exchanges charge a small fee for matching buyers and sellers and then compensate market makers and other trading firms for executing stock orders on their venues. Stock market participants have been arguing over the system for more than a decade.
Opponents of the system say it harms investors because traders end up executing trades on the exchange that gives the biggest rebate, as opposed to where that trade would be best executed. The main US stock exchanges argue that rebates result in greater competition between the exchanges, and draws trading away from dark pools which are subject to less regulation.
“The Exchanges’ view is that US investors have better access to markets and information, spreads are narrower, and other trading costs for average investors are lower than they ever have been before,” the NYSE, Nasdaq, and Cboe said in a joint statement to the SEC about the program.
IEX, which gained exchange status in 2016, is notably against rebates and favours the pilot.
“We’re excited that the proposed pilot will directly examine the impact of rebates on trading quality,” John Ramsay, chief market policy officer at IEX, said in a statement.
Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat and noted critic of maker taker, applauded the decision by the SEC.
“This pilot program is an important step towards reforming a broken system and eliminating conflicts of interest that hurt ordinary investors,” Warner said.
The pilot would force exchanges to decrease their fees, which they use to pay rebates, in order to analyse the degree to which the current system impacts market quality and execution quality.
Specifically, the exchanges would be required to run three test groups or “buckets.” Each bucket will have fees that are lower than the current rates. There will also be a control group that will allow exchanges to charge fees at current levels. One group will not allow rebates.
“A no-rebate bucket will provide the data needed to have a conversation about whether these conflicted payments should have a place in our markets,” Ramsay said.
The full specifics of the pilot are pending and subject to industry feedback. It’s not clear exactly when the pilot would be implemented.
This post has been updated from its original form to include a statement from Virginia Democratic Senator Mark Warner.