The 2018 US midterms will be the most expensive in history – here are the candidates who have raised and spent the most money since Trump's election

Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesUS Senate candidate Rep. Beto O’Rourke, a Texas Democrat, raked in a staggering $US38 million in 2018’s third fundraising quarter.
  • The 2018 midterms are in just three days, and they’re shaping up to be the most expensive in history.
  • The Center of Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign spending, projects a grand total of $US5.2 billion will be spent on this year’s elections.
  • Democratic candidates are capitalising on a wave of enthusiasm to raise record numbers of small donations, while Republicans dominate in the arena of outside spending.
  • Here are the Congressional candidates who have raised and spent the most money since Trump’s election:

The 2018 midterm elections are in just three days away, and the stakes couldn’t be higher as Democrats seek to take back the House of Representatives and minimise Republican gains in the Senate, in the first congressional elections since President Donald Trump’s victory in 2016.

Not only have this year’s midterms garnered record-high levels of early voter turnout, but it’s looking like they will be the most expensive congressional elections in US history. The Center for Responsive Politics projects that a staggering total of $US5.2 billion will be spent in this year’s midterms, breaking the previous record of $US4.4 billion in 2016.

“We expected to see the numbers climb, as they typically do, but the astonishing spike in campaign donations is a solid indicator of the intensity driving this year’s campaigns,” Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, said about the 2018 fundraising numbers.

Before the midterms even started, two high-profile special elections, one in Georgia’s 6th congressional district and in Pennslyvannia’s former 18th district, attracted record-high donations individual donations from Democrats looking to channel their frustration with Trump into congressional races.

That initial enthusiasm in fundraising precipitated this year’s windfall for Democratic candidates, who have raised $US1.3 billion from small donors compared to under $US1 billion for Republicans. When it comes to outside spending from political action committees (PACs) and non-profits, however, Republicans lead the pack.

Here are the House and Senate candidates who have raised and spent the most money:


The House candidates who have raised the most money:

Shayanne Gal/Business Insider

Jon Ossoff’s bid to challenge Republican Karen Handel for a July 2017 special election in Georgia’s 6th district gained national attention and a surge of out-of-state donations, making his race the most expensive the 2017-18 cycle with a total of $US56 million raised between him and his opponent Karen Handel.

Some House candidates are wealthy enough to mostly self-fund their campaigns, such as lottery winner Gil Cisneros in California’s 39th congressional district, who is running to flip the open seat vacated by Rep. Ed Royce, and multimillionaire Greg Gianforte, who won a 2017 special election for Montana’ at-large seat but is running again in 2018 in a tight race.

So far, Cisneros and Gianforte have given $US8.8 and $US2.5 million respectively to their own campaigns, making their congressional bids some of the most expensive this cycle. Likewise, David Trone has donated $US15 million to himself and Scott Wallace $US12 million.

In 1976, the Supreme Court struck down limits on candidates financing their own campaigns.

Like Ossoff, Conor Lamb’s March 2018 bid to win a special election in a Pennsylvania district which Trump carried by 19 points drew national attention and huge outside fundraising from individual donors to support Lamb and outside spending to support his opponent.

High-profile incumbents like Devin Nunes, the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and Steve Scalise, the Republican Majority Whip, also rank high in their fundraising capabilities without self-financing.


The House candidates who have spent the most money:

Shayanne Gal/Skye Gould/Business Insider

Since federal campaign finance law requires candidates to spend 100% of the money they raise for a given election on that race, the House candidates who have raised the most money also tend to be the ones who spend the most.

One person on the list of highest spenders but not fundraisers is Rep. Paul Ryan, the powerful speaker of the House of Representatives, who is retiring this year. Ryan is giving away approximately $US10.7 million of the money raised through his campaign committee.

He’s given about $US7 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, presumably to help other Republican candidates, and another $US3 million to assorted Republican campaign consulting firms.

Meanwhile, David Trone in Maryland’s 6th district (which is considered solidly blue) and Scott Wallace in Pennsylvania’s newly-redistricted 1st congressional district, rated a toss-up by FiveThirtyEight, are spending $US15 and $US11 million respectively, largely self-financing their bids.


The Senate candidates who have raised the most amount of money:

Shayanne Gal/Business Insider

Rep. Beto O’Rourke broke an all-time quarterly fundraising record when he raked in a staggering $US38 million in the 3rd quarter of 2018 alone. He’s running to defeat Sen. Ted Cruz in Texas, and his rapid rise to national prominence and fundraising prowess have made him a star in the Democratic party.

Some of the highest fundraisers are also the most prominent figures in their respective parties, like Cruz and Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin.

As in the House, wealthy Senate candidates like Rick Scott in Florida, who is challenging Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson, and pharmaceutical executive Bob Hugin, the Republican candidate in New Jersey challenging embattled Democrat Bob Menendez, are largely self-funding their campaigns.

Scott, whose net worth is estimated around $US233 million, has spent about $US51 million on his own campaign, making up 75% of his total fundraising. Similarly, Hugin has poured in $US27 million in his bid against Menendez.

On the other hand, O’Rourke, who is not taking corporate PAC money, receives half his donations, or about $US30 million, from small donors (those who spend $US200 or less) and large donors.

Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Heidi Heitkamp also eschew corporate PAC money as much as they can, and similarly rely on individual donations.

Heitkamp, who represents North Dakota, recieved an outpouring of $US12 million individual donations from across the country in the 2 weeks after she made the politically perilous decision to vote no on the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, but she’s still projected to lose her seat to Rep. Kevin Cramer.


The Senate candidates who have spent the most money:

Shayanne Gal/Business Insider

Rick Scott and Beto O’Rourke lead the pack by a wide margin in campaign spending, with $US66 and $US59 million respectively in campaign this cycle. While Scott is pouring money in TV ads across Florida, O’Rourke is buying up not just TV, but also Facebook and Twitter ads in bulk.

The next-highest spender, Sen. Claire McCaskill, spent just about half as much as O’Rourke, with $US31.9 in expenditures so far. Other high-spenders include candidates running in close races, such Sen. Bill Nelson in Florida, Scott’s opponent, Rep. Jacky Rosen in Nevada, and Doug Jones, who narrowly beat Roy Moore in a special election for an Alabama Senate seat in 2017.

The dominance of ultra-wealthy, self-financed candidates among the highest-spending House and Senate candidates may give off the illusion that extravagantly rich candidates can effectively “buy” elections, but researchers have actually found otherwise.

Research from political scientist Adam Brown of Brigham Young-University concluded that candidates being able to spend exorbitant amounts of money with their own personal wealth has a relatively weak effect on their vote share compared to external donations.

He instead found the ability to fundraise large amounts from outside donors is a much better predictor of electoral success, arguing that candidates attracting lots of donations signals their attractiveness as a candidate to voters.

And even though Brown’s work demonstrates the importance of outside fundraising, it doesn’t determine the result of an election.

Jon Ossoff, the highest fundraiser and spender among House candidates this cycle, lost to Karen Handel by 4 points points in the Georgia special election, despite out raising her by a stunning $US23 million, most of which came from small donors.

And in Pennsylvania’s former 18th district, Democrat Conor Lamb won by a just a few hundred votes against Rick Saccone in the March 2018 special election, despite $US11 million being spent to support Saccone (much of which came from outside groups) compared to Lamb’s $US4 million in spending.


Read more of Business Insider’s 2018 Midterm Election coverage:

Business Insider

NOW WATCH: Briefing videos

Business Insider Emails & Alerts

Site highlights each day to your inbox.

Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram.