Recently, Slate’s L.V. Anderson advised Americans to work less in 2016. This is not a new idea.
In an essay reposted recently on Longform, Russell argued that people would spend their leisure time doing active things and not passive activities if they only worked fewer hours.
Although TV hadn’t been invented yet in 1932, Russell foresaw the wastefulness of idle time spent with television’s predecessors — the movies and radio.
“The pleasures of urban populations have become mainly passive: seeing cinemas, watching football matches, listening to the radio, and so on,” Russell said. “This results from the fact that their active energies are fully taken up with work; if they had more leisure, they would again enjoy pleasures in which they took an active part.”
Nearly 85 years later, Russell’s insights remain relevant in America.
Gallup reported last year that the average American workweek had spiked to 47 hours, and that 18% of those surveyed worked more than 60 hours a week.
Americans don’t appear to be taking vacations to recharge, either. A study commissioned this year by the US Travel Association found American workers, on average, neglected to use nearly five of their allotted vacation days, as the Wall Street Journal reported.
Today, many overworked Americans spend their rare free time watching television, possibly because their brains are too tired for meaningful activities. Recent data from the Bureau of Labour Statistics shows that Americans spend most of their time sleeping, working, and watching TV, as Business Insider’s Andy Kiersz had reported.
According to Russell’s logic, Americans would watch less TV if they could have more time to relax. His essay also argued that it’s economically possible for people to work fewer hours.
For most of history, humans relied on hard work for a subsistence livelihood, Russell wrote. But, he added, technological advancements since the Industrial Revolution have made it possible to produce more with much less work. World War I demonstrated that point because victorious nations maintained tremendous levels of production even though a vast amount of their populations left productive occupations to help fight the war, according to his essay.
But despite modern advances in machinery, we don’t work fewer hours because our culture stresses that hard work is an important virtue, according to Russell. “In America men often work long hours even when they are well off; such men, naturally, are indignant at the idea of leisure for wage-earners, except as the grim punishment of unemployment; in fact, they dislike leisure even for their sons,” he wrote.
Russell’s antidote to this problem would be seen as dramatic in 2016; he proposed work days lasting four hours rather than eight. That would maintain adequate productivity without exhausting people from overwork to the point where they spend their rare free time with lazy activities, he argued.
As an example, Russell pointed to upper class members of society with plenty of leisure time. Historically, they have used their leisure time to make vital contributions to civilisation through scientific discoveries, artistic and literary endeavours, and other influences over policy and social relations.
The original version of this post was written by former Business Insider intern Corey Adwar.
NOW WATCH: Ideas videos
Business Insider Emails & Alerts
Site highlights each day to your inbox.